Comparison of the orthodontic treatment outcomes with the extraction of lower incisors associated with torque control
Aim: This prospective clinical study evaluated the cephalometric effects of orthodontic treatment with lower incisor extraction associated with buccal torque. Methods: Cephalograms were evaluated at the beginning (T1) and the end (T2) of orthodontic treatment of 20 patients with a mean age of 32.2 years, Angle Class I malocclusion, and anteroinferior crowding. Orthodontic treatment was performed with a MBT prescription bracket, 0.022” slot with modified torque programming in the lower incisors (central and lateral: +6º), and a single lower incisor was extracted. Cephalometric measurements were performed using Dolphin® software by a single calibrated examiner. Data analysis was performed using the t-test for dependent samples, with a significance level of 5%. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in the cephalometric measurements evaluated (p≥0.194). Conclusions: Orthodontic treatment carried out with extraction of lower incisors and associated with buccal torque did not promote dental and tegumentary cephalometric changes, positively impacting the completion of the treatment.
Authors
- Heloísa Cristina Valdrighi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7567-1990)
- Diego Patrik Alves Carneiro (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7864-3055)
- Sílvia Amélia Scudeler Vedovello (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7203-2867)
- Carolina Carmo de Menezes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8875-8611)
- Fernando Pizi Bonini (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3252-4700)
Institutions
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
- Centro Universitário Herminio Ometto de Araras (BR)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Brazilian journal of oral sciences/Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
- Published
- 2025-03-28
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v24i00.8674307
- Primary Topic
- Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00