ARE SHORT NAILS EQUALLY AS EFFECTIVE AS LONG NAILS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF SUBTROCHANTERIC FEMORAL FRACTURES? A META-ANALYSIS

Subtrochanteric fractures present a challenge in treatment due to their varied aetiologies and complexities. Surgical intervention aims to alleviate pain and facilitate early mobility, but associated post-operative mortality remains considerable. The mortality further increases should a surgical complication occur, necessitating appropriate implant choice and surgical technique. While intramedullary nailing is the standard treatment, the choice between short and long nails remains contentious. This meta-analysis aims to compare the complication outcomes of short and long cephalomedullary nail (CMN) fixation for subtrochanteric hip fractures. A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Medline, Embase, and CINAHL databases were searched for relevant studies. Inclusion criteria comprised studies directly comparing short and long nails in treating subtrochanteric fractures, including Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) and comparative studies. Data synthesis and statistical analysis were performed using RevMan 5.23.5 software. After screening, three retrospective comparative studies met the inclusion criteria. This involved a total of 4097 subjects with subtrochanteric fractures, of whom 785 were treated with short nails and 3312 with long nails. The mean ages across the studies ranged from 78.9 to 83.2 years. Peri-implant fracture and implant failure were statistically higher in short nails, with p values 0.005 and 0.01, respectively. The overall reoperation rates, non-union, and deep infection weren't statistically different between both groups, with p values 0.55, 0.92, and 0.40, respectively. Our findings challenge previous recommendations favouring the use of short nails across all per-trochanteric hip fractures and suggest that long nails are safer than short nails for the subtrochanteric group, since they are associated with lower rates of implant failure and peri-implant fractures. This is the first meta-analysis to investigate the effect of nail length on the outcomes of subtrochanteric fractures among all proximal femoral fractures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2025.2.042
Primary Topic
Hip and Femur Fractures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ARE SHORT NAILS EQUALLY AS EFFECTIVE AS LONG NAILS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF SUBTROCHANTERIC FEMORAL FRACTURES? A META-ANALYSIS

Amr Ahmed Hosny Abdo Selim, Nikhil Ponugoti, Deepak Menon
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Hip and Femur Fractures
article

ARE SHORT NAILS EQUALLY AS EFFECTIVE AS LONG NAILS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF SUBTROCHANTERIC FEMORAL FRACTURES? A META-ANALYSIS

Amr Ahmed Hosny Abdo Selim, Nikhil Ponugoti, Deepak Menon
article en

Abstract

Subtrochanteric fractures present a challenge in treatment due to their varied aetiologies and complexities. Surgical intervention aims to alleviate pain and facilitate early mobility, but associated post-operative mortality remains considerable. The mortality further increases should a surgical complication occur, necessitating appropriate implant choice and surgical technique. While intramedullary nailing is the standard treatment, the choice between short and long nails remains contentious. This meta-analysis aims to compare the complication outcomes of short and long cephalomedullary nail (CMN) fixation for subtrochanteric hip fractures. A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Medline, Embase, and CINAHL databases were searched for relevant studies. Inclusion criteria comprised studies directly comparing short and long nails in treating subtrochanteric fractures, including Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) and comparative studies. Data synthesis and statistical analysis were performed using RevMan 5.23.5 software. After screening, three retrospective comparative studies met the inclusion criteria. This involved a total of 4097 subjects with subtrochanteric fractures, of whom 785 were treated with short nails and 3312 with long nails. The mean ages across the studies ranged from 78.9 to 83.2 years. Peri-implant fracture and implant failure were statistically higher in short nails, with p values 0.005 and 0.01, respectively. The overall reoperation rates, non-union, and deep infection weren't statistically different between both groups, with p values 0.55, 0.92, and 0.40, respectively. Our findings challenge previous recommendations favouring the use of short nails across all per-trochanteric hip fractures and suggest that long nails are safer than short nails for the subtrochanteric group, since they are associated with lower rates of implant failure and peri-implant fractures. This is the first meta-analysis to investigate the effect of nail length on the outcomes of subtrochanteric fractures among all proximal femoral fractures.

Orthopaedic ProceedingsVol. 107-B(SUPP_2)
North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital (GB), Keele University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Hip and Femur Fractures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.