Quantification of GHG Emissions Using Different Methodologies in Tropical Conventional Cashew Cultivation

Quantifying GHG emissions from cashew cultivation, especially in Brazil, is essential to assess the environmental impact and promote the sustainable development of this activity. The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare methods for quantifying GHG emissions based on empirical equations for life cycle inventories, using the conventional cashew production system in Brazil as a case study. The scope of the study encompasses, from gate to gate in a dwarf cashew production system, considering the production of one ton of cashew as a functional unit. GHG emissions were assessed and compared using the following methodologies: Nemecek-Calc, WFLDB, IPCC-Calc, BR-Calc, and Agri-footprint. The environmental assessment followed ISO standards (14040, 14044, and 14067). The results showed that the carbon footprint varied among the evaluated methodologies, with a difference of 24.5% between the highest value (129.5 kg CO2 eq-IPCC-Calc and BR-Calc) and the lowest (104 kg CO2 eq-Nemecek-Calc) per ton of cashew. N2O was the main contributor to emissions, accounting for up to 75.9%, while CO2 represented up to 25.8%. Based on the analysis criteria, WFLDB, IPCC-Calc, and BR-Calc are the most recommended methodologies, balancing clarity, scientific robustness, and regional adaptation. The choice of methodology is fundamental, as it directly influences the results and interpretation of the carbon footprint in cashew farming, impacting the sustainability of this agricultural activity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073042
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantification of GHG Emissions Using Different Methodologies in Tropical Conventional Cashew Cultivation

Jonnathan Richeds da Silva Sales, Claudivan Feitosa de Lacerda, Antônio Fábio da Silva Lima, Adriana Corrêa-Guimarães et al.
2 citations
Sustainability
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
3.43
article

Quantification of GHG Emissions Using Different Methodologies in Tropical Conventional Cashew Cultivation

Jonnathan Richeds da Silva Sales, Claudivan Feitosa de Lacerda, Antônio Fábio da Silva Lima, Adriana Corrêa-Guimarães, Viviane da Silva Barros, Maria Cléa Brito de Figueirêdo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Quantifying GHG emissions from cashew cultivation, especially in Brazil, is essential to assess the environmental impact and promote the sustainable development of this activity. The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare methods for quantifying GHG emissions based on empirical equations for life cycle inventories, using the conventional cashew production system in Brazil as a case study. The scope of the study encompasses, from gate to gate in a dwarf cashew production system, considering the production of one ton of cashew as a functional unit. GHG emissions were assessed and compared using the following methodologies: Nemecek-Calc, WFLDB, IPCC-Calc, BR-Calc, and Agri-footprint. The environmental assessment followed ISO standards (14040, 14044, and 14067). The results showed that the carbon footprint varied among the evaluated methodologies, with a difference of 24.5% between the highest value (129.5 kg CO2 eq-IPCC-Calc and BR-Calc) and the lowest (104 kg CO2 eq-Nemecek-Calc) per ton of cashew. N2O was the main contributor to emissions, accounting for up to 75.9%, while CO2 represented up to 25.8%. Based on the analysis criteria, WFLDB, IPCC-Calc, and BR-Calc are the most recommended methodologies, balancing clarity, scientific robustness, and regional adaptation. The choice of methodology is fundamental, as it directly influences the results and interpretation of the carbon footprint in cashew farming, impacting the sustainability of this agricultural activity.

SustainabilityVol. 17(7)
Universidad de Valladolid (ES), Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (BR), Universidade Federal do Ceará (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.