AUTOMATED MACHINE LEARNING-BASED MRI RADIOMIC ANALYSIS TO IDENTIFY AND DIAGNOSE PATIENTS WITH FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT

Diagnosing femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) using manual radiographic, CT and MRI analysis is user-dependent and has only moderate accuracy. We leverage radiomics and machine learning techniques—proven successful in oncology—to automatically extract quantitative MRI features beyond the human eye: first-order statistics, shape-based metrics, and texture matrices. We aimed to differentiate healthy, symptomatic, and asymptomatic hips; measuring reliability and generalisability through external validation. We investigated femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) using three distinct cohorts: 1) a primary cohort of 31 FAI patients (22F, mean age 36) imaged with/without contrast on 3T MRI using four-phase Dixon sequences; 2) healthy volunteers (20 patients); 3) cohort of asymptomatic FAI (31 patients); compared with an external validation cohort of 185 monolateral symptomatic FAI patients’ water-only Dixon images. Automated segmentation (Total Segmentator and STAPLE algorithm) isolated key hip structures. PyRadiomics extracted 6,752 radiomic features across ROIs after 1mm isotropic resampling. Ten machine learning models were evaluated using four-fold cross-validation, maintaining patient-level data separation between training/validation/testing sets. This yielded 480 unique models (10 classifiers × 48 feature sets), with top performers validated against the test set (three-label classification) and cohort 3 (symptomatic identification). Seven out of ten models achieved accuracy >0.85. Notably, Random Forest Classifier (RFC), Gradient Boosting Classifier (GBC), Extra Trees Classifier (ETC), and Bagging Classifier (BC) attained perfect accuracy at least once using fewer than 20 features. In the external validation cohort, eight models also surpassed 0.85 accuracy, including five methods—Support Vector Classifier (SVC), Decision Tree Classifier (DTC), Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB), Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA), and K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN)— with perfect accuracy though with increased variability. This study highlights the effectiveness of 20 novel MRI-based radiomic features to reliably differentiate between symptomatic FAI, asymptomatic FAI, and healthy hips. Decision Tree Classifier and Bagging Classifier predicted correctly 100% of the FAI patients even with varied imaging protocols. Additionally, automated radiomic selection identified novel gluteal muscle features specific to symptomatic FAI, improving the diagnostic yield of MRI beyond bone, cartilage and labrum in FAI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2025.2.007
Primary Topic
Hip disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AUTOMATED MACHINE LEARNING-BASED MRI RADIOMIC ANALYSIS TO IDENTIFY AND DIAGNOSE PATIENTS WITH FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT

Riccardo Lattanzi, Eros Montin, Iman Khodarahmi, Sion Glyn‐Jones et al.
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Hip disorders and treatments
article

AUTOMATED MACHINE LEARNING-BASED MRI RADIOMIC ANALYSIS TO IDENTIFY AND DIAGNOSE PATIENTS WITH FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT

Riccardo Lattanzi, Eros Montin, Iman Khodarahmi, Sion Glyn‐Jones, Srikar R. Namireddy, Hariharan Subbiah-Ponniah, Kartik Logishetty
article en

Abstract

Diagnosing femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) using manual radiographic, CT and MRI analysis is user-dependent and has only moderate accuracy. We leverage radiomics and machine learning techniques—proven successful in oncology—to automatically extract quantitative MRI features beyond the human eye: first-order statistics, shape-based metrics, and texture matrices. We aimed to differentiate healthy, symptomatic, and asymptomatic hips; measuring reliability and generalisability through external validation. We investigated femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) using three distinct cohorts: 1) a primary cohort of 31 FAI patients (22F, mean age 36) imaged with/without contrast on 3T MRI using four-phase Dixon sequences; 2) healthy volunteers (20 patients); 3) cohort of asymptomatic FAI (31 patients); compared with an external validation cohort of 185 monolateral symptomatic FAI patients’ water-only Dixon images. Automated segmentation (Total Segmentator and STAPLE algorithm) isolated key hip structures. PyRadiomics extracted 6,752 radiomic features across ROIs after 1mm isotropic resampling. Ten machine learning models were evaluated using four-fold cross-validation, maintaining patient-level data separation between training/validation/testing sets. This yielded 480 unique models (10 classifiers × 48 feature sets), with top performers validated against the test set (three-label classification) and cohort 3 (symptomatic identification). Seven out of ten models achieved accuracy >0.85. Notably, Random Forest Classifier (RFC), Gradient Boosting Classifier (GBC), Extra Trees Classifier (ETC), and Bagging Classifier (BC) attained perfect accuracy at least once using fewer than 20 features. In the external validation cohort, eight models also surpassed 0.85 accuracy, including five methods—Support Vector Classifier (SVC), Decision Tree Classifier (DTC), Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB), Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA), and K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN)— with perfect accuracy though with increased variability. This study highlights the effectiveness of 20 novel MRI-based radiomic features to reliably differentiate between symptomatic FAI, asymptomatic FAI, and healthy hips. Decision Tree Classifier and Bagging Classifier predicted correctly 100% of the FAI patients even with varied imaging protocols. Additionally, automated radiomic selection identified novel gluteal muscle features specific to symptomatic FAI, improving the diagnostic yield of MRI beyond bone, cartilage and labrum in FAI.

Orthopaedic ProceedingsVol. 107-B(SUPP_2)
University College Hospital (GB), University of Oxford (GB), NYU Langone Health (US), University College London (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Hip disorders and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.