BETWEEN-HOSPITAL VARIABILITY IN THE MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOMES OF POSTOPERATIVE PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURES

Post-operative periprosthetic femoral fractures (POPFFs) following joint replacement surgery pose complex challenges, with differences in management and outcomes across healthcare facilities. However, there is limited published literature on such variability to inform improvement initiatives. This study aims to quantify the between-hospital variations in surgical management and short-term outcomes for POPFF. Administrative data from all 177 NHS hospital Trusts in England were analysed for patients aged 18 and over with a primary diagnosis of POPFF between April 2016 and December 2022. Patient demographics, comorbidities, procedures, in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS, dichotomised at the upper quartile, <23 days and ≥23 days), and emergency 30-day all-cause readmissions were extracted. Procedures were classified as revision with or without fixation, fixation alone, and neither procedure. Multilevel models with random intercepts for hospitals and funnel plots assessed the non-random variations between hospitals in procedures and outcomes. Variation was assessed before and after adjusting for patient age, sex and number of comorbidities. Among 39,035 hospitalised patients, 66% were female, with a median age of 82 years. Common comorbidities included hypertension (51.7%), arrhythmias (24.3%), and chronic pulmonary disease (18.2%). Hospital variation existed in treatment, with adjusted intraclass correlation coefficients for fixation without revision, revision, and no surgical procedure at 4%, 3.8%, and 2.4%, respectively. Funnel plots revealed many outliers for procedure choice and outcomes, though the numbers fell appreciably after adjustment. Among 177 hospitals after adjustment, nine (5.1%) exceeded the upper 95% control limit for fixation and 17 (9.6%) did so for revision, and LOS (n=25, 14.1%) and emergency 30-day readmission (n=7, 3.9%) but fewer for mortality (n=2, 1.1%). Between-hospital variation exists for the management of, and some short-term outcomes following, POPFFs in England. This warrants further explanation to better understand the reasons for this and how these may be overcome.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2025.2.010
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BETWEEN-HOSPITAL VARIABILITY IN THE MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOMES OF POSTOPERATIVE PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURES

Cliff Shelton, Mohammad Aryaie, Toby O. Smith, Malcolm Reed et al.
1 links
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
article

BETWEEN-HOSPITAL VARIABILITY IN THE MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOMES OF POSTOPERATIVE PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURES

Cliff Shelton, Mohammad Aryaie, Toby O. Smith, Malcolm Reed, Alex Bottle, Jonathan Peter Evans
article en

Abstract

Post-operative periprosthetic femoral fractures (POPFFs) following joint replacement surgery pose complex challenges, with differences in management and outcomes across healthcare facilities. However, there is limited published literature on such variability to inform improvement initiatives. This study aims to quantify the between-hospital variations in surgical management and short-term outcomes for POPFF. Administrative data from all 177 NHS hospital Trusts in England were analysed for patients aged 18 and over with a primary diagnosis of POPFF between April 2016 and December 2022. Patient demographics, comorbidities, procedures, in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS, dichotomised at the upper quartile, <23 days and ≥23 days), and emergency 30-day all-cause readmissions were extracted. Procedures were classified as revision with or without fixation, fixation alone, and neither procedure. Multilevel models with random intercepts for hospitals and funnel plots assessed the non-random variations between hospitals in procedures and outcomes. Variation was assessed before and after adjusting for patient age, sex and number of comorbidities. Among 39,035 hospitalised patients, 66% were female, with a median age of 82 years. Common comorbidities included hypertension (51.7%), arrhythmias (24.3%), and chronic pulmonary disease (18.2%). Hospital variation existed in treatment, with adjusted intraclass correlation coefficients for fixation without revision, revision, and no surgical procedure at 4%, 3.8%, and 2.4%, respectively. Funnel plots revealed many outliers for procedure choice and outcomes, though the numbers fell appreciably after adjustment. Among 177 hospitals after adjustment, nine (5.1%) exceeded the upper 95% control limit for fixation and 17 (9.6%) did so for revision, and LOS (n=25, 14.1%) and emergency 30-day readmission (n=7, 3.9%) but fewer for mortality (n=2, 1.1%). Between-hospital variation exists for the management of, and some short-term outcomes following, POPFFs in England. This warrants further explanation to better understand the reasons for this and how these may be overcome.

Orthopaedic ProceedingsVol. 107-B(SUPP_2)
University of Exeter (GB), Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Warwick (GB), Imperial College London (GB), Lancaster University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.