SIMULTANEOUS “FIX AND REPLACE” HAS NONINFERIOR SURVIVORSHIP COMPARED WITH STAGED ARTHROPLASTY IN ACETABULAR FRACTURE MANAGEMENT IN MEDIUM-TERM FOLLOW-UP

In an increasingly frail population, simultaneous “fix and replace” surgery (fixation of the acetabulum to accommodate a press fit cup and total hip arthroplasty (THA)) is a novel alternative to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) alone in the management of acetabular fractures. We aimed to determine whether patients managed with “fix and replace” have comparable survivorship to those undergoing staged THA following previous open reduction and internal fixation for acetabular fracture. All Patients with acetabular fractures surgically managed within a Scottish Tertiary centre over a five year period (01/01/2018-30/05/2023) were identified. Thirty-four patients underwent “fix and replace” surgery and 133 underwent acetabular ORIF alone. Twenty-one of these patients subsequently required staged THA (6%). Follow up mean was 2.7 years (SD +/-1.7) for “fix and replace” versus 3.3 years (SD +/- 1.5) for staged THA. There was no statistical significance between the two groups with regards to BMI or sex. The fix and replace group were older (p=0.001), had higher ASA (p=0.006) and CCI (p=0.027), respectively. High energy mechanism of injury accounted for 56% of the “fix and replace” group compared to 48% in the ORIF to THA. 74% of “fix and replace” were associated/complex fractures (LeTournel) compared to 53% of staged THA. Mean wait to surgery was 3 days in the “fix and replace” group compared to 186 days from listing to operation in the staged THA group. Survival analysis demonstrated acceptable results for both groups at four years year with Fix and Replace 86% at one year and 76% survival in the staged THA group (p=0.13). Complications were comparable in both groups (41% versus 43%, p value= 0.58). In our experience “fix and replace” is an option for the elderly, co-morbid patient with an acetabular fracture to enable early weightbearing with acceptable survivorship compared to staged THA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2025.2.011
Primary Topic
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SIMULTANEOUS “FIX AND REPLACE” HAS NONINFERIOR SURVIVORSHIP COMPARED WITH STAGED ARTHROPLASTY IN ACETABULAR FRACTURE MANAGEMENT IN MEDIUM-TERM FOLLOW-UP

Sarah Gill, Matthew J. Kennedy, Thomas H. Williamson, Ben Wheelwright et al.
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
article

SIMULTANEOUS “FIX AND REPLACE” HAS NONINFERIOR SURVIVORSHIP COMPARED WITH STAGED ARTHROPLASTY IN ACETABULAR FRACTURE MANAGEMENT IN MEDIUM-TERM FOLLOW-UP

Sarah Gill, Matthew J. Kennedy, Thomas H. Williamson, Ben Wheelwright, Ian Kennedy, Andrew G Marsh
article en

Abstract

In an increasingly frail population, simultaneous “fix and replace” surgery (fixation of the acetabulum to accommodate a press fit cup and total hip arthroplasty (THA)) is a novel alternative to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) alone in the management of acetabular fractures. We aimed to determine whether patients managed with “fix and replace” have comparable survivorship to those undergoing staged THA following previous open reduction and internal fixation for acetabular fracture. All Patients with acetabular fractures surgically managed within a Scottish Tertiary centre over a five year period (01/01/2018-30/05/2023) were identified. Thirty-four patients underwent “fix and replace” surgery and 133 underwent acetabular ORIF alone. Twenty-one of these patients subsequently required staged THA (6%). Follow up mean was 2.7 years (SD +/-1.7) for “fix and replace” versus 3.3 years (SD +/- 1.5) for staged THA. There was no statistical significance between the two groups with regards to BMI or sex. The fix and replace group were older (p=0.001), had higher ASA (p=0.006) and CCI (p=0.027), respectively. High energy mechanism of injury accounted for 56% of the “fix and replace” group compared to 48% in the ORIF to THA. 74% of “fix and replace” were associated/complex fractures (LeTournel) compared to 53% of staged THA. Mean wait to surgery was 3 days in the “fix and replace” group compared to 186 days from listing to operation in the staged THA group. Survival analysis demonstrated acceptable results for both groups at four years year with Fix and Replace 86% at one year and 76% survival in the staged THA group (p=0.13). Complications were comparable in both groups (41% versus 43%, p value= 0.58). In our experience “fix and replace” is an option for the elderly, co-morbid patient with an acetabular fracture to enable early weightbearing with acceptable survivorship compared to staged THA.

Orthopaedic ProceedingsVol. 107-B(SUPP_2)
Queen Elizabeth University Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.