Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the Chronic Rhinosinusitis Patient-Reported Outcome (CRS-PRO) into Hebrew

<b>Backgrounds:</b> Designed to measure symptoms and quality-of-life impacts, the chronic rhinosinusitis patient-reported outcome (CRS-PRO) questionnaire is a novel instrument tailored to CRS patients. This study aimed to translate the CRS-PRO into Hebrew, adapt it cross-culturally, and assess its reliability and validity. <b>Methods:</b> A prospective study was conducted with 127 participants across three groups: CRS, functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS), and control groups (healthy individuals). Participants completed the Hebrew CRS-PRO at baseline and one month later. The Hebrew version was developed according to the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research guidelines for translation and cross-cultural adaptation. <b>Results:</b> Of the 127 participants (mean age 47.3 ± 17.7 years, range 18-93), 77 were males (60.6%), and 50 were females (39.4%). The Hebrew CRS-PRO demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.936) and strong discriminant validity among the three groups. Baseline mean scores were 7.2 for the control group, 25.2 for the FESS group, and 27.1 for the CRS group, which subsequently decreased to 6.5, 12.9, and 20.4, respectively, after one month (ANOVA, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Test-retest reliability, supported by Pearson's correlation (<i>p</i> < 0.01) and intraclass correlation (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), demonstrated the questionnaire's effectiveness in identifying CRS-related symptoms and monitoring improvement after FESS. <b>Conclusions:</b> The adaptation and validation of the CRS-PRO into Hebrew resulted in a reliable instrument in patients with CRS. It exhibited robust reliability, internal consistency, and strong discriminant validity, effectively differentiating between healthy individuals and CRS patients and those who are pre- and post-FESS. Additionally, the Hebrew CRS-PRO questionnaire may be effective for evaluating patients before and after FESS surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14072347
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the Chronic Rhinosinusitis Patient-Reported Outcome (CRS-PRO) into Hebrew

Leigh J. Sowerby, Firas Kassem, Tomer Boldes, Eitan Shavit et al.
2 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
3.70
article

Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the Chronic Rhinosinusitis Patient-Reported Outcome (CRS-PRO) into Hebrew

Leigh J. Sowerby, Firas Kassem, Tomer Boldes, Eitan Shavit, Rabie Shehadeh, Ameen Biadsee, Benny Nageris
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Backgrounds:</b> Designed to measure symptoms and quality-of-life impacts, the chronic rhinosinusitis patient-reported outcome (CRS-PRO) questionnaire is a novel instrument tailored to CRS patients. This study aimed to translate the CRS-PRO into Hebrew, adapt it cross-culturally, and assess its reliability and validity. <b>Methods:</b> A prospective study was conducted with 127 participants across three groups: CRS, functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS), and control groups (healthy individuals). Participants completed the Hebrew CRS-PRO at baseline and one month later. The Hebrew version was developed according to the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research guidelines for translation and cross-cultural adaptation. <b>Results:</b> Of the 127 participants (mean age 47.3 ± 17.7 years, range 18-93), 77 were males (60.6%), and 50 were females (39.4%). The Hebrew CRS-PRO demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.936) and strong discriminant validity among the three groups. Baseline mean scores were 7.2 for the control group, 25.2 for the FESS group, and 27.1 for the CRS group, which subsequently decreased to 6.5, 12.9, and 20.4, respectively, after one month (ANOVA, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Test-retest reliability, supported by Pearson's correlation (<i>p</i> < 0.01) and intraclass correlation (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), demonstrated the questionnaire's effectiveness in identifying CRS-related symptoms and monitoring improvement after FESS. <b>Conclusions:</b> The adaptation and validation of the CRS-PRO into Hebrew resulted in a reliable instrument in patients with CRS. It exhibited robust reliability, internal consistency, and strong discriminant validity, effectively differentiating between healthy individuals and CRS patients and those who are pre- and post-FESS. Additionally, the Hebrew CRS-PRO questionnaire may be effective for evaluating patients before and after FESS surgery.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(7)
Western University (CA), Tel Aviv University (IL), Meir Medical Center (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
3.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.