Where infectious diseases occur: restrictive measures and the concept of place

Greater attention should be given to place when considering whether to, and how to, implement restrictive measures in response to infectious disease outbreaks and pandemics. Human beings cannot experience the world except in place, while place allows us to act ethically and in relation to other persons. Some have described place as a location with meaning to humans. Our individual and collective sense of meaning and identities are partly created in and by the places we live, while our sense of agency and security are shaped by them. Although taking the concept of place seriously is central to other disciplines and cultures, it is- with some notable exceptions- absent in the bioethics literature, including that of public health ethics. This paper attempts to outline how attending to the normative aspects of place can help explain some of our lingering COVID19-related trauma, as well as be used constructively in responding to future outbreaks when we cannot avoid the use of restrictive measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioethics News
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-025-00237-2
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Zoonotic diseases and public health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.76

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Where infectious diseases occur: restrictive measures and the concept of place

Diego S. Silva
2 citations
Bioethics News
Zoonotic diseases and public health
3.76
article

Where infectious diseases occur: restrictive measures and the concept of place

Diego S. Silva
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Greater attention should be given to place when considering whether to, and how to, implement restrictive measures in response to infectious disease outbreaks and pandemics. Human beings cannot experience the world except in place, while place allows us to act ethically and in relation to other persons. Some have described place as a location with meaning to humans. Our individual and collective sense of meaning and identities are partly created in and by the places we live, while our sense of agency and security are shaped by them. Although taking the concept of place seriously is central to other disciplines and cultures, it is- with some notable exceptions- absent in the bioethics literature, including that of public health ethics. This paper attempts to outline how attending to the normative aspects of place can help explain some of our lingering COVID19-related trauma, as well as be used constructively in responding to future outbreaks when we cannot avoid the use of restrictive measures.

Bioethics NewsVol. 43(2)
The University of Sydney (AU)
University of Oxford, University of Sydney
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Zoonotic diseases and public health
3.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Where infectious diseases occur: restrictive measures and the concept of place — Diego S. Silva · Bioethics News (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS