Improving AOD Algorithm Evaluation: A Spatial Matching Method for Minimizing Quality Control Bias

Satellite-derived aerosol optical depth (AOD) products from MODIS and VIIRS sensors are vital for monitoring global aerosol distributions. However, inconsistencies in quality control algorithms and spatial resolution introduce errors that complicate validation processes and reduce the accuracy of satellite-to-ground comparisons. This study proposes the “optimal” spatial matching method to minimize these errors and enable a more accurate evaluation of retrieval algorithm performance. Using AERONET ground observations from 2012 to 2021, MODIS and VIIRS AOD products were systematically validated with three spatial matching methods—“direct”, “average”, and “optimal”. Results demonstrate that the “optimal” method consistently outperformed the other methods by selecting pixel values. The study highlights significant quality control disparities across AOD products and demonstrates that high-resolution products, with purer pixels, achieve superior accuracy under the “optimal” method. These insights provide valuable guidance for optimizing dataset applications and refining aerosol retrieval algorithms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17071235
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving AOD Algorithm Evaluation: A Spatial Matching Method for Minimizing Quality Control Bias

Shanlong Wu, Qinhuo Liu, Aixia Yang, Bailin Du et al.
1 citations
Remote Sensing
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
0.80
article

Improving AOD Algorithm Evaluation: A Spatial Matching Method for Minimizing Quality Control Bias

Shanlong Wu, Qinhuo Liu, Aixia Yang, Bailin Du, Bo Zhong, He Cai, Xiaoya Wang, Haizhen Zhang, Jinxiong Jiang, Junjun Wu, Yang Qiao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Satellite-derived aerosol optical depth (AOD) products from MODIS and VIIRS sensors are vital for monitoring global aerosol distributions. However, inconsistencies in quality control algorithms and spatial resolution introduce errors that complicate validation processes and reduce the accuracy of satellite-to-ground comparisons. This study proposes the “optimal” spatial matching method to minimize these errors and enable a more accurate evaluation of retrieval algorithm performance. Using AERONET ground observations from 2012 to 2021, MODIS and VIIRS AOD products were systematically validated with three spatial matching methods—“direct”, “average”, and “optimal”. Results demonstrate that the “optimal” method consistently outperformed the other methods by selecting pixel values. The study highlights significant quality control disparities across AOD products and demonstrates that high-resolution products, with purer pixels, achieve superior accuracy under the “optimal” method. These insights provide valuable guidance for optimizing dataset applications and refining aerosol retrieval algorithms.

Remote SensingVol. 17(7)
China Meteorological Administration (CN), China Academy of Space Technology (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Aerospace Information Research Institute (CN), Beijing Meteorological Bureau (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Northeastern University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.