Comparison of ultrasound-assisted extraction and modified QuEChERS technique for extraction of hesperidin from lemon peel (Citrus limon L.) as determined by HPLC
Hesperidin (HSP) is a bioflavonoid known for its notable health benefits. Recent extraction strategies have aimed to minimize hazardous solvent use and simplify procedures to improve cost-effectiveness. This study compares ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) with a modified “quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe” (QuEChERS) method for the recovery of HSP. High-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection (HPLC-DAD) was used for quantification. The modified QuEChERS method resulted in the highest extraction efficiency while significantly reducing processing time. The validated method demonstrated excellent sensitivity (LOQ: 10.0 µg/mL), high accuracy (recovery >93 %), and good precision (RSD <3.4 %), making it a reliable and cost-effective approach for routine HSP analysis in citrus peel. These findings indicate that the modified QuEChERS technique offers a promising alternative to UAE for the rapid and efficient extraction of HSP. • Innovative flavonoid extraction approach optimized for citrus-derived food matrices. • Hesperidin yield was 48.7 % higher and extraction time 75 % shorter than with ultrasound. • Method validation confirmed high accuracy and low variability in hesperidin quantification. • Efficient, rapid, and suitable sample preparation for citrus-based food products.
Authors
- Zsolt Ajtony (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6484-5147)
- Rita Székelyhidi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0119-9870)
- Erika Lakatos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5148-6715)
- Beatrix Sik (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1786-2710)
- Laura Végh
Institutions
- Széchenyi István University (HU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
- Published
- 2025-03-31
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2025.107553
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Chromatography in Natural Products
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.75