DFT Study of Au3In and Au3In2 Intermetallic Compounds: Structural Stability, Fracture Toughness, Anisotropic Elasticity, and Thermophysical Properties for Advanced Applications

This study systematically explores the structural stability, mechanical properties, elastic anisotropy, fracture toughness, and thermophysical characteristics of Au<sub>3</sub>In and Au<sub>3</sub>In<sub>2</sub> intermetallic compounds (IMCs) through density functional theory (DFT) simulations. Employing the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) and the Voigt-Reuss-Hill approximation enables precise predictions of polycrystalline elastic behavior, providing critical insights into the intrinsic stability and mechanical anisotropy of these IMCs. Structural optimization identifies the equilibrium lattice parameters and cohesive energies, indicating stronger atomic bonding and superior structural stability in Au<sub>3</sub>In relative to Au<sub>3</sub>In<sub>2</sub>. Elastic constant calculations confirm mechanical stability and reveal pronounced anisotropic elastic behavior; Au<sub>3</sub>In exhibits significant stiffness along the [010] crystallographic direction, while Au<sub>3</sub>In<sub>2</sub> demonstrates notable stiffness predominantly along the [001] direction. Both Au<sub>3</sub>In and Au<sub>3</sub>In<sub>2</sub> exhibit ductile characteristics, confirmed by positive Cauchy pressures and elevated bulk-to-shear modulus (<i>K</i>/<i>G</i>) ratios. Fracture toughness analysis further establishes that Au<sub>3</sub>In offers greater resistance to crack propagation compared to Au<sub>3</sub>In<sub>2</sub>, suggesting its suitability in mechanically demanding applications. Thermophysical property evaluations demonstrate that Au<sub>3</sub>In possesses higher thermal conductivity, elevated Debye temperature, and superior volumetric heat capacity relative to Au<sub>3</sub>In<sub>2</sub>, reflecting its enhanced capability for effective thermal management in electronic packaging. Anisotropy assessments, utilizing both universal and Zener anisotropy indices, reveal significantly higher mechanical anisotropy in Au<sub>3</sub>In<sub>2</sub>, influencing its practical applicability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18071561
Citations
7
Primary Topic
MXene and MAX Phase Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DFT Study of Au3In and Au3In2 Intermetallic Compounds: Structural Stability, Fracture Toughness, Anisotropic Elasticity, and Thermophysical Properties for Advanced Applications

Yang-Lun Liu, Ching-Feng Yu
7 citations
Materials
MXene and MAX Phase Materials
3.62
article

DFT Study of Au3In and Au3In2 Intermetallic Compounds: Structural Stability, Fracture Toughness, Anisotropic Elasticity, and Thermophysical Properties for Advanced Applications

Yang-Lun Liu, Ching-Feng Yu
article en
7 citations

Abstract

This study systematically explores the structural stability, mechanical properties, elastic anisotropy, fracture toughness, and thermophysical characteristics of Au<sub>3</sub>In and Au<sub>3</sub>In<sub>2</sub> intermetallic compounds (IMCs) through density functional theory (DFT) simulations. Employing the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) and the Voigt-Reuss-Hill approximation enables precise predictions of polycrystalline elastic behavior, providing critical insights into the intrinsic stability and mechanical anisotropy of these IMCs. Structural optimization identifies the equilibrium lattice parameters and cohesive energies, indicating stronger atomic bonding and superior structural stability in Au<sub>3</sub>In relative to Au<sub>3</sub>In<sub>2</sub>. Elastic constant calculations confirm mechanical stability and reveal pronounced anisotropic elastic behavior; Au<sub>3</sub>In exhibits significant stiffness along the [010] crystallographic direction, while Au<sub>3</sub>In<sub>2</sub> demonstrates notable stiffness predominantly along the [001] direction. Both Au<sub>3</sub>In and Au<sub>3</sub>In<sub>2</sub> exhibit ductile characteristics, confirmed by positive Cauchy pressures and elevated bulk-to-shear modulus (<i>K</i>/<i>G</i>) ratios. Fracture toughness analysis further establishes that Au<sub>3</sub>In offers greater resistance to crack propagation compared to Au<sub>3</sub>In<sub>2</sub>, suggesting its suitability in mechanically demanding applications. Thermophysical property evaluations demonstrate that Au<sub>3</sub>In possesses higher thermal conductivity, elevated Debye temperature, and superior volumetric heat capacity relative to Au<sub>3</sub>In<sub>2</sub>, reflecting its enhanced capability for effective thermal management in electronic packaging. Anisotropy assessments, utilizing both universal and Zener anisotropy indices, reveal significantly higher mechanical anisotropy in Au<sub>3</sub>In<sub>2</sub>, influencing its practical applicability.

MaterialsVol. 18(7)
National United University (TW), Feng Chia University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
MXene and MAX Phase Materials
3.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.