An automated cone-beam CT dosimetric assessment pipeline for adaptive head and neck radiotherapy

Abstract Background and purpose: Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) is commonly used to mitigate effects of anatomical change during head and neck (H&N) radiotherapy. The process of identifying patients for ART can be subjective and resource-intensive. This feasibility project aims to design and validate a pipeline to automate the process and use it to assess the current clinical pathway for H&N treatments. Methods: The pipeline analysed patients’ on-set cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans to identify inter-fractional anatomical changes. CBCTs were converted into synthetic CTs, contours were automatically generated, and the original plan was recomputed. Each synthetic CT was evaluated against a set of dosimetric goals, with failed goals causing an ART recommendation. To validate pipeline performance, a ‘gold standard’ was synthesised by recomputing patients’ original plans on a rescan-CT acquired during treatment and identifying failed clinical goals. The pipeline sensitivity and specificity compared to this ‘gold standard’ were calculated for 12 ART patients. The pipeline was then run on a cohort of 12 ART and 14 non-ART patients, and its sensitivity and specificity were instead calculated against the clinical decision made. Results: The pipeline showed good agreement with the synthesised ‘gold standard’ with an optimum sensitivity of 0·83 and specificity of 0·67. When run over a cohort containing both ART and non-ART patients and assessed against the subjective clinical decision made, the pipeline showed no predictive power (sensitivity: 0·58, specificity: 0·47). Conclusions: Good agreement with the ‘gold standard’ gives confidence in pipeline performance and disagreement with clinical decisions implies implementation could help standardise the current clinical pathway.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s146039692500010x
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An automated cone-beam CT dosimetric assessment pipeline for adaptive head and neck radiotherapy

Heather Fulton, Bashar Al‐Qaisieh, D. J. Bird, Ruth Newton et al.
1 links
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

An automated cone-beam CT dosimetric assessment pipeline for adaptive head and neck radiotherapy

Heather Fulton, Bashar Al‐Qaisieh, D. J. Bird, Ruth Newton, Shona Whittam, Christopher O’Hara, Marcus Tyyger, Emily Russell, R. Speight, Robin Prestwich, Sebastian Andersson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and purpose: Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) is commonly used to mitigate effects of anatomical change during head and neck (H&N) radiotherapy. The process of identifying patients for ART can be subjective and resource-intensive. This feasibility project aims to design and validate a pipeline to automate the process and use it to assess the current clinical pathway for H&N treatments. Methods: The pipeline analysed patients’ on-set cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans to identify inter-fractional anatomical changes. CBCTs were converted into synthetic CTs, contours were automatically generated, and the original plan was recomputed. Each synthetic CT was evaluated against a set of dosimetric goals, with failed goals causing an ART recommendation. To validate pipeline performance, a ‘gold standard’ was synthesised by recomputing patients’ original plans on a rescan-CT acquired during treatment and identifying failed clinical goals. The pipeline sensitivity and specificity compared to this ‘gold standard’ were calculated for 12 ART patients. The pipeline was then run on a cohort of 12 ART and 14 non-ART patients, and its sensitivity and specificity were instead calculated against the clinical decision made. Results: The pipeline showed good agreement with the synthesised ‘gold standard’ with an optimum sensitivity of 0·83 and specificity of 0·67. When run over a cohort containing both ART and non-ART patients and assessed against the subjective clinical decision made, the pipeline showed no predictive power (sensitivity: 0·58, specificity: 0·47). Conclusions: Good agreement with the ‘gold standard’ gives confidence in pipeline performance and disagreement with clinical decisions implies implementation could help standardise the current clinical pathway.

Journal of Radiotherapy in PracticeVol. 24
University of Leeds (GB), Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), RaySearch Laboratories (Sweden) (SE)
Cancer Research UK
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.