Playing the Classics in the Nineteenth Century

It is a truism that since the eighteenth century the labels classics and classical have been applied to various musical repertoires, performance styles, and their reception.A witness to the latter term's widening significance and usage is found in its expanding definition in George Grove's original Dictionary of Music and Musicians.In the first edition (1879), Hubert Parry determined that classical is used for 'works which have held their place in general estimation for a considerable time, and of new works which are generally considered of the same type and style'. 1 The current definition in the New Grove Online delineates four overlapping possible understandings: '(i) formal discipline; (ii) model of excellence, supplemented by (iii) that which has to do with Greek or Latin antiquity [ ], and (iv) that which is opposed to "romantic"'. 2 These definitions imply that these terms are tied up in debates that go a long way in defining the underlying aesthetic value in musical cultures.This notion is not new.Already some 40 years ago, in a text defining classics in literature, Italo Calvino emphasized that calling something a classic is a means of creating and emphasizing one's own (national) identity. 3 This special issue of Nineteenth-Century Music Review interrogates Calvino's point by studying the role of classics and the classical in processes of musical identity formation.It does so through four contrasting nineteenth-century case studies, covering discourses and their impact on performance practices in tsarist Russia, the German-speaking regions, and Victorian England.The goal of this collection is twofold.First, to show that these 'works that have held their place in general estimation for a considerable time' and have become 'models of excellence' were not just adopted based on their musical qualities, but that they affected and were affected by claims of societal value in different nations.In doing so, this issue underlines classics and classical as historically and geographically situated terms and entwined with notions of (musical) identity formation, showing how differentiated the conceptions and their aims could be.Second, this issue will show

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nineteenth-Century Music Review
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1479409825000059
Primary Topic
Classical Studies and Philology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Playing the Classics in the Nineteenth Century

Annelies Andries, Marten Noorduin
Nineteenth-Century Music Review
Classical Studies and Philology
article

Playing the Classics in the Nineteenth Century

Annelies Andries, Marten Noorduin
article en

Abstract

It is a truism that since the eighteenth century the labels classics and classical have been applied to various musical repertoires, performance styles, and their reception.A witness to the latter term's widening significance and usage is found in its expanding definition in George Grove's original Dictionary of Music and Musicians.In the first edition (1879), Hubert Parry determined that classical is used for 'works which have held their place in general estimation for a considerable time, and of new works which are generally considered of the same type and style'. 1 The current definition in the New Grove Online delineates four overlapping possible understandings: '(i) formal discipline; (ii) model of excellence, supplemented by (iii) that which has to do with Greek or Latin antiquity [ ], and (iv) that which is opposed to "romantic"'. 2 These definitions imply that these terms are tied up in debates that go a long way in defining the underlying aesthetic value in musical cultures.This notion is not new.Already some 40 years ago, in a text defining classics in literature, Italo Calvino emphasized that calling something a classic is a means of creating and emphasizing one's own (national) identity. 3 This special issue of Nineteenth-Century Music Review interrogates Calvino's point by studying the role of classics and the classical in processes of musical identity formation.It does so through four contrasting nineteenth-century case studies, covering discourses and their impact on performance practices in tsarist Russia, the German-speaking regions, and Victorian England.The goal of this collection is twofold.First, to show that these 'works that have held their place in general estimation for a considerable time' and have become 'models of excellence' were not just adopted based on their musical qualities, but that they affected and were affected by claims of societal value in different nations.In doing so, this issue underlines classics and classical as historically and geographically situated terms and entwined with notions of (musical) identity formation, showing how differentiated the conceptions and their aims could be.Second, this issue will show

Nineteenth-Century Music ReviewVol. 22(2)
Utrecht University (NL), Lübeck Academy of Music (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Classical Studies and Philology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.