Relative trust in critical minerals governance for just transitions in Ghana and Australia

This paper explores the role of trust in the sustainable mining of critical minerals for a just transition across two complementary and contrasting cases, Ghana and Australia: the former being an emerging critical mineral economy and having a need to enforce social and environmental practices that depart from its history of non-critical minerals mining; the latter using domestic and international institutions to build trust in minerals governance at home and overseas. Based on an interdisciplinary exploratory and reflective methodology relying on four different data streams, this paper offers empirical research on how trust can be built and sustained in-country and through a combination of policies and practices, both on the part of mining companies and governments. We conceptualise trust in terms of confidence about a situation or entity based on experience and reasonable expectations. We found that in critical minerals mining communities, key predictors of trust are satisfaction, participation, social cohesion that is built on shared experiences of the past and present, and an adequate degree of social and economic independence for affected communities. The policy implications of the centrality of trust come at a crucial time when critiques of the role of the critical minerals industry in re-colonising and greenwashing are on the rise. This study finds government regulatory and policy settings can be used to promote trust in ways that are applicable to both developed and developing countries. • This paper examines trust in critical minerals governance with emphasis on company-community relationship and how governments contribute to this. • We show that trust can be elusive but can be predicted by environment, social and governance principles. • As a belief system, trust is relative but can be influenced by factors that mining companies and governments have control over. • Building trust well can also address the emerging theme of justice in the transitions and reduce supply chain disruptions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Resources Policy
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105568
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Mining and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relative trust in critical minerals governance for just transitions in Ghana and Australia

Jane Alver, Stephen Bartos, R.P. Burke, Clement Sefa-Nyarko et al.
6 citations
Resources Policy
Mining and Resource Management
6.04
article

Relative trust in critical minerals governance for just transitions in Ghana and Australia

Jane Alver, Stephen Bartos, R.P. Burke, Clement Sefa-Nyarko, Joshua Matanzima, Darren Sinclair, Evan Hamman
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This paper explores the role of trust in the sustainable mining of critical minerals for a just transition across two complementary and contrasting cases, Ghana and Australia: the former being an emerging critical mineral economy and having a need to enforce social and environmental practices that depart from its history of non-critical minerals mining; the latter using domestic and international institutions to build trust in minerals governance at home and overseas. Based on an interdisciplinary exploratory and reflective methodology relying on four different data streams, this paper offers empirical research on how trust can be built and sustained in-country and through a combination of policies and practices, both on the part of mining companies and governments. We conceptualise trust in terms of confidence about a situation or entity based on experience and reasonable expectations. We found that in critical minerals mining communities, key predictors of trust are satisfaction, participation, social cohesion that is built on shared experiences of the past and present, and an adequate degree of social and economic independence for affected communities. The policy implications of the centrality of trust come at a crucial time when critiques of the role of the critical minerals industry in re-colonising and greenwashing are on the rise. This study finds government regulatory and policy settings can be used to promote trust in ways that are applicable to both developed and developing countries. • This paper examines trust in critical minerals governance with emphasis on company-community relationship and how governments contribute to this. • We show that trust can be elusive but can be predicted by environment, social and governance principles. • As a belief system, trust is relative but can be influenced by factors that mining companies and governments have control over. • Building trust well can also address the emerging theme of justice in the transitions and reduce supply chain disruptions.

Resources PolicyVol. 103
The University of Queensland (AU), King's College London (GB), University of Canberra (AU), La Trobe University (AU)
La Trobe University, Menzies Centre for Australian Studies, King's College London, University of London, Australian Research Council
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Mining and Resource Management
6.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.