The methodological reporting quality in strictly randomized controlled trials for COVID-19 and precise reporting of Chinese herbal medicine formula intervention

The methodological reporting quality in strictly randomized RCTs on CHM formulas for COVID-19 is inadequate-the reporting of sample size calculation, allocation concealment, and blinding need to improve especially. The checklist of sub-questions based on CONSORT-CHM formulas 2017 can help report and assess CHM formula intervention more precisely. The methodological reporting quality of RCTs published in English and enrolled participants during the first wave of the pandemic is worse than the studies that recruited subjects after the first wave of the pandemic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1532290
Primary Topic
Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The methodological reporting quality in strictly randomized controlled trials for COVID-19 and precise reporting of Chinese herbal medicine formula intervention

Shi-Yan Qian, Guo‐qing Zheng, Jing-Ying Wu, Min‐Li Chen et al.
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
article

The methodological reporting quality in strictly randomized controlled trials for COVID-19 and precise reporting of Chinese herbal medicine formula intervention

Shi-Yan Qian, Guo‐qing Zheng, Jing-Ying Wu, Min‐Li Chen, Yan Wang, Lixiang Wang, Jiang-Li Yang, Jue-Yan Zheng, H. Ye
article en

Abstract

The methodological reporting quality in strictly randomized RCTs on CHM formulas for COVID-19 is inadequate-the reporting of sample size calculation, allocation concealment, and blinding need to improve especially. The checklist of sub-questions based on CONSORT-CHM formulas 2017 can help report and assess CHM formula intervention more precisely. The methodological reporting quality of RCTs published in English and enrolled participants during the first wave of the pandemic is worse than the studies that recruited subjects after the first wave of the pandemic.

Frontiers in PharmacologyVol. 16
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (CN), Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (CN), Hangzhou Normal University (CN)
Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.