Fire season and drought influence fire effects on invasive grasses: A meta‐analysis

Abstract Fire can shape plant communities when species respond differently to fire characteristics like season and intensity. If invasive plants are more vulnerable than native species to specific aspects of fire, managers could use prescribed fires to control non‐native species. We conducted a meta‐analysis of fire effects on six closely related Afro‐Eurasian and Australian grasses ( Bothriochloa bladhii , B. ischaemum , B. pertusa , Dichanthium annulatum , D. aristatum and D. sericeum , collectively ‘invasive bluestems’) that have invaded grasslands worldwide. Using data from 31 studies (only 3 from their native range), we evaluated whether these grasses (275 effect sizes) responded differently than native grasses (184 effect sizes) to fire season, fuel load and drought. Original data included 15 different response variables (e.g. biomass, survival) that were converted to standardized mean difference for analysis. Fires in summer, fall and early winter had negative effects on invasive bluestems; no fire season had significant positive effects. Most data were for B. ischaemum , but the other bluestems may also be vulnerable to summer fire. Native grasses did not show significant negative responses in any month. Drought (Keetch–Byram Drought Index) in the month before fire increased the negative effects of fire on invasive bluestems but not native grasses. Drought after fire led to similar negative effects on both groups. Unexpectedly, fuel load (which influences fire intensity) did not significantly influence fire effects in any analysis. At the fuel loads examined (~600–10,000 kg/ha dried herbaceous biomass), fire intensity may have been too low to cause meristem mortality. Between‐study heterogeneity was large in all analyses ( I 2 > 80%), suggesting that additional factors beyond those reported in the studies influence fire effects. These factors could include plant phenology, fire behaviour, weather conditions during the fire and soil characteristics. Synthesis and applications : Fires during summer and fall, especially during dry conditions, could harm invasive bluestems relative to native grasses, likely due to subtle differences in heat sensitivity, phenology and drought resistance. Other invasive species may have similar vulnerabilities to specific fire seasons and rainfall conditions that allow the use of fire as a control method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Ecology
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.70041
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fire season and drought influence fire effects on invasive grasses: A meta‐analysis

Justin C. Havird, Jamie L. Foster, Caroline E. Farrior, Meagan M. Lesak et al.
1 citations
Journal of Applied Ecology
Fire effects on ecosystems
1.11
article

Fire season and drought influence fire effects on invasive grasses: A meta‐analysis

Justin C. Havird, Jamie L. Foster, Caroline E. Farrior, Meagan M. Lesak, Megan K. Clayton, Charlotte M. Reemts, Carolyn V. Whiting, Amelia A. Wolf, Whitney Behr
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Fire can shape plant communities when species respond differently to fire characteristics like season and intensity. If invasive plants are more vulnerable than native species to specific aspects of fire, managers could use prescribed fires to control non‐native species. We conducted a meta‐analysis of fire effects on six closely related Afro‐Eurasian and Australian grasses ( Bothriochloa bladhii , B. ischaemum , B. pertusa , Dichanthium annulatum , D. aristatum and D. sericeum , collectively ‘invasive bluestems’) that have invaded grasslands worldwide. Using data from 31 studies (only 3 from their native range), we evaluated whether these grasses (275 effect sizes) responded differently than native grasses (184 effect sizes) to fire season, fuel load and drought. Original data included 15 different response variables (e.g. biomass, survival) that were converted to standardized mean difference for analysis. Fires in summer, fall and early winter had negative effects on invasive bluestems; no fire season had significant positive effects. Most data were for B. ischaemum , but the other bluestems may also be vulnerable to summer fire. Native grasses did not show significant negative responses in any month. Drought (Keetch–Byram Drought Index) in the month before fire increased the negative effects of fire on invasive bluestems but not native grasses. Drought after fire led to similar negative effects on both groups. Unexpectedly, fuel load (which influences fire intensity) did not significantly influence fire effects in any analysis. At the fuel loads examined (~600–10,000 kg/ha dried herbaceous biomass), fire intensity may have been too low to cause meristem mortality. Between‐study heterogeneity was large in all analyses ( I 2 > 80%), suggesting that additional factors beyond those reported in the studies influence fire effects. These factors could include plant phenology, fire behaviour, weather conditions during the fire and soil characteristics. Synthesis and applications : Fires during summer and fall, especially during dry conditions, could harm invasive bluestems relative to native grasses, likely due to subtle differences in heat sensitivity, phenology and drought resistance. Other invasive species may have similar vulnerabilities to specific fire seasons and rainfall conditions that allow the use of fire as a control method.

Journal of Applied EcologyVol. 62(5)
The Nature Conservancy (US), National Park Service (US), Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (US), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US), Texas A&M University System (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Fire effects on ecosystems
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.