Synergistic Effect of Implant Surface Physicochemical Modifications and Macrogeometry on the Early Stages of Osseointegration: An In Vivo Preclinical Study

This preclinical, in vivo study aimed to histologically and histomorphometrically evaluate the effect of implant design features on bone healing during the early stages of osseointegration. Three different implant macrogeometries and surface treatments were evaluated: (1) trapezoidal threads with decompressing vertical chambers and blasted acid-etched surface (Maestro/Blasted+AE); (2) large thread pitch implant with deep and wide threads, with TiUnite surface (RS/TiUnite); and (3) progressive buttress threads with SLActive surface (BL/SLActive). Implant surfaces were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, profilometry, and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Implants were placed in the iliac bone of 12 female sheep (~65 kg and 2 years old). Following healing times of 3- and 6- weeks, samples were harvested and subjected to qualitative and quantitative histological/histomorphometric evaluations. Percentages of bone-to-implant contact (%BIC) along the implant's perimeter and bone area fraction occupancy (%BAFO) within implant threads were measured, and results were analyzed using a linear mixed model analysis. All implants, irrespective of differences in macrogeometry and surface treatment, at both healing times demonstrated successful osseointegration. Evaluations of %BIC yielded no statistically significant differences among groups at 3 and 6 weeks (p > 0.052). While no significant differences were detected among groups for %BAFO at 3 weeks (p > 0.249), Maestro/Blasted+AE yielded significantly higher degrees of bone formation within implant threads relative to RS/TiUnite (p = 0.043) and BL/SLActive group (p = 0.032) at the 6-week time point. Qualitative histological analyses depicted different osseointegration features for the different implants. While Maestro/Blasted+AE portrayed evidence of an intramembranous-like osseointegration pathway in the healing chambers and interfacial remodeling at thread tips, BL/SLActive and RS/TiUnite groups predominantly presented an interfacial bone remodeling healing pathway. Implant design features influenced the osseointegration pathway, where implants with decompressing vertical chambers enhanced bone formation between implant threads.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.35569
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Synergistic Effect of Implant Surface Physicochemical Modifications and Macrogeometry on the Early Stages of Osseointegration: An In Vivo Preclinical Study

Blaire V. Slavin, Ísis de Fátima Balderrama, Vasudev Vivekanand Nayak, Ernesto B. Benalcázar Jalkh et al.
2 citations
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
1.35
article

Synergistic Effect of Implant Surface Physicochemical Modifications and Macrogeometry on the Early Stages of Osseointegration: An In Vivo Preclinical Study

Blaire V. Slavin, Ísis de Fátima Balderrama, Vasudev Vivekanand Nayak, Ernesto B. Benalcázar Jalkh, Estevam A. Bonfante, Lukasz Witek, Paulo G. Coelho
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This preclinical, in vivo study aimed to histologically and histomorphometrically evaluate the effect of implant design features on bone healing during the early stages of osseointegration. Three different implant macrogeometries and surface treatments were evaluated: (1) trapezoidal threads with decompressing vertical chambers and blasted acid-etched surface (Maestro/Blasted+AE); (2) large thread pitch implant with deep and wide threads, with TiUnite surface (RS/TiUnite); and (3) progressive buttress threads with SLActive surface (BL/SLActive). Implant surfaces were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, profilometry, and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Implants were placed in the iliac bone of 12 female sheep (~65 kg and 2 years old). Following healing times of 3- and 6- weeks, samples were harvested and subjected to qualitative and quantitative histological/histomorphometric evaluations. Percentages of bone-to-implant contact (%BIC) along the implant's perimeter and bone area fraction occupancy (%BAFO) within implant threads were measured, and results were analyzed using a linear mixed model analysis. All implants, irrespective of differences in macrogeometry and surface treatment, at both healing times demonstrated successful osseointegration. Evaluations of %BIC yielded no statistically significant differences among groups at 3 and 6 weeks (p > 0.052). While no significant differences were detected among groups for %BAFO at 3 weeks (p > 0.249), Maestro/Blasted+AE yielded significantly higher degrees of bone formation within implant threads relative to RS/TiUnite (p = 0.043) and BL/SLActive group (p = 0.032) at the 6-week time point. Qualitative histological analyses depicted different osseointegration features for the different implants. While Maestro/Blasted+AE portrayed evidence of an intramembranous-like osseointegration pathway in the healing chambers and interfacial remodeling at thread tips, BL/SLActive and RS/TiUnite groups predominantly presented an interfacial bone remodeling healing pathway. Implant design features influenced the osseointegration pathway, where implants with decompressing vertical chambers enhanced bone formation between implant threads.

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied BiomaterialsVol. 113(4)
University of Miami (US), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Sagrado Coração (BR), Dr. John T. Macdonald Foundation (US), Centro Universitário de Araraquara (BR), New York University (US), Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.