The Mental Health of Essential Medical and Non-Medical Frontline Workers amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Quantitative Comparative Study

The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the link between workplace conditions, mental health, and employee well-being. This study examined whether perceived supervisor support and fear of infection predicted depression scores among 339 participants using the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS). Hierarchical and multiple regression analyses revealed that supervisor support and fear of infection collectively explained 10.1% of the variance in depression scores (p p p p p < 0.01). The sample predominantly comprised healthcare workers, highlighting their vulnerability during public health crises. While the variance explained was modest, all relationships were statistically significant, emphasizing the importance of workplace support systems. Practical implications include fostering supervisor support and implementing proactive mental health initiatives to reduce fear and depression, particularly in healthcare settings during emergencies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Journal of Medical Psychology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojmp.2025.142006
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Mental Health of Essential Medical and Non-Medical Frontline Workers amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Quantitative Comparative Study

Paul D. R. Johnson, Bridgette Hester, John F. Padgett
Open Journal of Medical Psychology
COVID-19 and Mental Health
article

The Mental Health of Essential Medical and Non-Medical Frontline Workers amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Quantitative Comparative Study

Paul D. R. Johnson, Bridgette Hester, John F. Padgett
article en

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the link between workplace conditions, mental health, and employee well-being. This study examined whether perceived supervisor support and fear of infection predicted depression scores among 339 participants using the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS). Hierarchical and multiple regression analyses revealed that supervisor support and fear of infection collectively explained 10.1% of the variance in depression scores (p p p p p < 0.01). The sample predominantly comprised healthcare workers, highlighting their vulnerability during public health crises. While the variance explained was modest, all relationships were statistically significant, emphasizing the importance of workplace support systems. Practical implications include fostering supervisor support and implementing proactive mental health initiatives to reduce fear and depression, particularly in healthcare settings during emergencies.

Open Journal of Medical PsychologyVol. 14(02)
Grand Canyon University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
COVID-19 and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Mental Health of Essential Medical and Non-Medical Frontline Workers amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Quantitative Comparative Study — Paul D. R. Johnson, Bridgette Hester, et al. · Open Journal of Medical Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS