Spatio-temporal distribution of global stromatolites through geological time identified by a large language model approach

Introduction A substantial amount of data embedded within diverse literature makes it time-consuming to manually extract and compile extensive datasets. The use of large language models has become essential for the efficient extraction and analysis of big data. This study utilizes ChatGPT-4 to reconstruct a global database of stromatolites, spanning from the Precambrian to the present, to enhance our understanding of their spatial and temporal dynamics throughout geological time. Methods The data extraction process involved several steps: First, PDF documents containing stromatolite literature were gathered and converted into text format. Second, ChatGPT-4 was employed to extract data on stromatolite occurrences, including locations, ages, strata, and facies types from each sentence in the documents. Third, duplicates were removed, and the data were organized into three categories: 3,248 unique location-age pairs, 2,723 strata-age pairs, and 1,723 strata-age-facies type combinations. Additionally, 2,565 paleogeographical locations of stromatolite-bearing rocks were reconstructed using modern latitude and longitude coordinates and corresponding Phanerozoic ages. Results The newly obtained dataset reveals that stromatolite occurrences peaked during the Proterozoic, declined during the Early Phanerozoic, and exhibited fluctuations throughout the Phanerozoic. Seven global stromatolite hotspots were identified: the United States, Australia, India, Canada, China, England, and Russia. From the Cambrian to the Jurassic, stromatolites were predominantly distributed in low and middle latitudes, shifting to higher latitudes from the Cretaceous to the Quaternary. The proportion of inland aquatic stromatolites relative to marine stromatolites varied, ranging from 10% to 30% from the Mesoarchean to the Middle Mesoproterozoic, decreasing to less than 10% from the Late Mesoproterozoic to the Early Paleozoic, increasing to 10%–30% from the Devonian to the Jurassic, and remaining high (39%–53%) from the Cretaceous to the Quaternary. Discussion The findings highlight the temporal and spatial variability of stromatolite occurrences, shedding light on the evolution of these microbial structures over geological time. The distribution patterns suggest significant shifts in environmental conditions and provide valuable insights into paleogeographical and ecological dynamics. The use of ChatGPT-4 to extract and organize data from a large body of literature demonstrates the potential of large language models for advancing research in paleobiology and geology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Earth Science
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2025.1563011
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatio-temporal distribution of global stromatolites through geological time identified by a large language model approach

Hao Li, Min Zhang
1 citations
Frontiers in Earth Science
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
2.48
article

Spatio-temporal distribution of global stromatolites through geological time identified by a large language model approach

Hao Li, Min Zhang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction A substantial amount of data embedded within diverse literature makes it time-consuming to manually extract and compile extensive datasets. The use of large language models has become essential for the efficient extraction and analysis of big data. This study utilizes ChatGPT-4 to reconstruct a global database of stromatolites, spanning from the Precambrian to the present, to enhance our understanding of their spatial and temporal dynamics throughout geological time. Methods The data extraction process involved several steps: First, PDF documents containing stromatolite literature were gathered and converted into text format. Second, ChatGPT-4 was employed to extract data on stromatolite occurrences, including locations, ages, strata, and facies types from each sentence in the documents. Third, duplicates were removed, and the data were organized into three categories: 3,248 unique location-age pairs, 2,723 strata-age pairs, and 1,723 strata-age-facies type combinations. Additionally, 2,565 paleogeographical locations of stromatolite-bearing rocks were reconstructed using modern latitude and longitude coordinates and corresponding Phanerozoic ages. Results The newly obtained dataset reveals that stromatolite occurrences peaked during the Proterozoic, declined during the Early Phanerozoic, and exhibited fluctuations throughout the Phanerozoic. Seven global stromatolite hotspots were identified: the United States, Australia, India, Canada, China, England, and Russia. From the Cambrian to the Jurassic, stromatolites were predominantly distributed in low and middle latitudes, shifting to higher latitudes from the Cretaceous to the Quaternary. The proportion of inland aquatic stromatolites relative to marine stromatolites varied, ranging from 10% to 30% from the Mesoarchean to the Middle Mesoproterozoic, decreasing to less than 10% from the Late Mesoproterozoic to the Early Paleozoic, increasing to 10%–30% from the Devonian to the Jurassic, and remaining high (39%–53%) from the Cretaceous to the Quaternary. Discussion The findings highlight the temporal and spatial variability of stromatolite occurrences, shedding light on the evolution of these microbial structures over geological time. The distribution patterns suggest significant shifts in environmental conditions and provide valuable insights into paleogeographical and ecological dynamics. The use of ChatGPT-4 to extract and organize data from a large body of literature demonstrates the potential of large language models for advancing research in paleobiology and geology.

Frontiers in Earth ScienceVol. 13
Huanggang Normal University (CN), China University of Geosciences (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.