Bình luận Án lệ số 17/2018/Al về người xúi giục trong đồng phạm

Complicity is a distinct legal construct wherein two or more individuals intentionally engage in the commission of a criminal offence. The determination of whether a case involves complicity and the classification of each participant’s role are critical to the adjudication of criminal liability. Precedent No. 17/2018/AL provides clarification on the conduct of instigators in cases of complicity. However, the legal reasoning and factual circumstances in the precedent, particularly concerning the instigator’s indirect intent and the attribution of criminal liability in cases of incomplete offences, give rise to issues that merit further scholarly examination. Through a doctrinal analysis, this paper identifies inconsistencies in the application of the law in the precedent and proposes recommendations for refining the interpretation and application of Precedent No. 17/2018/AL

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Tạp chí Khoa học pháp lý Việt Nam.
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70236/tckhplvn.245
Primary Topic
Research studies in Vietnam
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bình luận Án lệ số 17/2018/Al về người xúi giục trong đồng phạm

Nguyễn Thị Phương Hoa
Tạp chí Khoa học pháp lý Việt Nam.
Research studies in Vietnam
article

Bình luận Án lệ số 17/2018/Al về người xúi giục trong đồng phạm

Nguyễn Thị Phương Hoa
article en

Abstract

Complicity is a distinct legal construct wherein two or more individuals intentionally engage in the commission of a criminal offence. The determination of whether a case involves complicity and the classification of each participant’s role are critical to the adjudication of criminal liability. Precedent No. 17/2018/AL provides clarification on the conduct of instigators in cases of complicity. However, the legal reasoning and factual circumstances in the precedent, particularly concerning the instigator’s indirect intent and the attribution of criminal liability in cases of incomplete offences, give rise to issues that merit further scholarly examination. Through a doctrinal analysis, this paper identifies inconsistencies in the application of the law in the precedent and proposes recommendations for refining the interpretation and application of Precedent No. 17/2018/AL

Tạp chí Khoa học pháp lý Việt Nam.(03(187))
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Research studies in Vietnam
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.