ILLEGALITY AS AN ELEMENT OF DISCIPLINARY MISCONDUCT OF MEDICAL WORKERS

This article addresses the issue of defining illegality as an essential element of disciplinary misconduct by medical workers. The relevance of this research is underscored by the importance of legal responsibility for medical professionals in contemporary society, as the quality of medical care and the conscientiousness of healthcare workers directly impact the most precious assets of any individual – life and health. Based on a theoretical analysis of the literature, the author concludes that the issues of medical responsibility are predominantly explored from the perspectives of criminal and civil law. However, the issues of disciplinary responsibility for medical workers are sector-specific and thus require examination through the lens of labor law norms. The article elucidates the significance of illegality as an essential characteristic of disciplinary misconduct, establishing it in line with the legal principle of the rule of law and aligning with notions of just punishment. The author attempts to classify disciplinary misconduct by medical workers based on the criterion of illegality. Using this classification and an analysis of judicial practices, the author proposes categorizing disciplinary misconduct into professional, performance-related, managerial (administrative), corruption-related, and ethical violations. The study acknowledges that harm is not a mandatory element of disciplinary misconduct, influencing only the severity of the sanctions imposed rather than the grounds for disciplinary responsibility. According to the author, this approach aligns well with the deontological model of medical ethics, viewed as the obligation of medical professionals to strictly adhere to norms, requirements, and rules of professional conduct.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Institute of Legislation and Legal Information of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52026/2788-5291_2025_80_1_114
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ILLEGALITY AS AN ELEMENT OF DISCIPLINARY MISCONDUCT OF MEDICAL WORKERS

Dinara Bagdatovna Razieva
Bulletin of Institute of Legislation and Legal Information of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Digital Transformation in Law
article

ILLEGALITY AS AN ELEMENT OF DISCIPLINARY MISCONDUCT OF MEDICAL WORKERS

Dinara Bagdatovna Razieva
article en

Abstract

This article addresses the issue of defining illegality as an essential element of disciplinary misconduct by medical workers. The relevance of this research is underscored by the importance of legal responsibility for medical professionals in contemporary society, as the quality of medical care and the conscientiousness of healthcare workers directly impact the most precious assets of any individual – life and health. Based on a theoretical analysis of the literature, the author concludes that the issues of medical responsibility are predominantly explored from the perspectives of criminal and civil law. However, the issues of disciplinary responsibility for medical workers are sector-specific and thus require examination through the lens of labor law norms. The article elucidates the significance of illegality as an essential characteristic of disciplinary misconduct, establishing it in line with the legal principle of the rule of law and aligning with notions of just punishment. The author attempts to classify disciplinary misconduct by medical workers based on the criterion of illegality. Using this classification and an analysis of judicial practices, the author proposes categorizing disciplinary misconduct into professional, performance-related, managerial (administrative), corruption-related, and ethical violations. The study acknowledges that harm is not a mandatory element of disciplinary misconduct, influencing only the severity of the sanctions imposed rather than the grounds for disciplinary responsibility. According to the author, this approach aligns well with the deontological model of medical ethics, viewed as the obligation of medical professionals to strictly adhere to norms, requirements, and rules of professional conduct.

Bulletin of Institute of Legislation and Legal Information of the Republic of KazakhstanVol. 80(1)
Weatherford College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Digital Transformation in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.