Optimise behavioural health and human factors research for deep space missions by classifying analogue scenarios and fidelity

Future human space missions beyond low Earth orbit face significant challenges in understanding and managing astronaut behaviour and performance in extreme environments, with behavioural health remaining a critical knowledge gap. Ground research in analogue environments offers cost-effective means to address these challenges. Still, due to analogues' compromised fidelity levels, the findings derived from such activity may only sometimes be reliable, rigorous and transferable to human space exploration. We hypothesise that gaps in understanding human behaviour and performance could be significantly addressed by using analogues with higher realism, which can accurately replicate specific conditions and yield more relevant insights to better inform future space missions. This paper takes a behavioural health approach to future spaceflight and evaluates analogue scenarios in such a perspective, to ensure the ecological validity and reliability of behavioural health research outcomes. Furthermore, we emphasise the functional-contextual importance of the features of analogue scenarios to resemble the complexity of current and/or future human space mission scenarios in terrestrial settings. Building on previously published research, we introduce the Extended Feature Classification System of Analogues (EFCSA) to identify analogue scenarios with greater realism. It evaluates the analogue’s fidelity level based on contextual and human factor features. Features themes include isolation, lack of resupplies, element of exploration, environmental conditions, biopsychosocial impact, and skill expertise, among others. Based on the EFCSA, we preliminarily identified a range of analogue scenarios into Low-, Mid-, and High-fidelities and introduced the term “Peak-fidelity”. The latter (such as wet cave exploration, and submerged cave system exploration and camping) and high-fidelity scenarios (saturation diving/underwater habitats, polar expeditions, polar overwintering, and submarines) offer the greatest fidelity in replicating space features with further potential. Mid-fidelity activities include technical diving (open water/pools) and dry cave exploration and camping. Low-fidelity activities include recreational diving (open water, <40 m), marine expeditions and sailing, piloting, parabolic flight, desert-based surface analogues and mountaineering expeditions. It is important to highlight that these results do not diminish the utility of other analogues; instead, the EFCSA helps to identify specific purposes for which analogues are useful, and serves as a means to improve analogue realism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Space Technologies
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frspt.2025.1391331
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Spaceflight effects on biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimise behavioural health and human factors research for deep space missions by classifying analogue scenarios and fidelity

Károly Kornél Schlosser, Krisztián Pósch, Iya Whiteley, Luis Luque Álvarez et al.
2 citations
Frontiers in Space Technologies
Spaceflight effects on biology
2.33
article

Optimise behavioural health and human factors research for deep space missions by classifying analogue scenarios and fidelity

Károly Kornél Schlosser, Krisztián Pósch, Iya Whiteley, Luis Luque Álvarez, Ilaria Cinelli, Thorsten Waelde, Gábor Pokorádi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Future human space missions beyond low Earth orbit face significant challenges in understanding and managing astronaut behaviour and performance in extreme environments, with behavioural health remaining a critical knowledge gap. Ground research in analogue environments offers cost-effective means to address these challenges. Still, due to analogues' compromised fidelity levels, the findings derived from such activity may only sometimes be reliable, rigorous and transferable to human space exploration. We hypothesise that gaps in understanding human behaviour and performance could be significantly addressed by using analogues with higher realism, which can accurately replicate specific conditions and yield more relevant insights to better inform future space missions. This paper takes a behavioural health approach to future spaceflight and evaluates analogue scenarios in such a perspective, to ensure the ecological validity and reliability of behavioural health research outcomes. Furthermore, we emphasise the functional-contextual importance of the features of analogue scenarios to resemble the complexity of current and/or future human space mission scenarios in terrestrial settings. Building on previously published research, we introduce the Extended Feature Classification System of Analogues (EFCSA) to identify analogue scenarios with greater realism. It evaluates the analogue’s fidelity level based on contextual and human factor features. Features themes include isolation, lack of resupplies, element of exploration, environmental conditions, biopsychosocial impact, and skill expertise, among others. Based on the EFCSA, we preliminarily identified a range of analogue scenarios into Low-, Mid-, and High-fidelities and introduced the term “Peak-fidelity”. The latter (such as wet cave exploration, and submerged cave system exploration and camping) and high-fidelity scenarios (saturation diving/underwater habitats, polar expeditions, polar overwintering, and submarines) offer the greatest fidelity in replicating space features with further potential. Mid-fidelity activities include technical diving (open water/pools) and dry cave exploration and camping. Low-fidelity activities include recreational diving (open water, <40 m), marine expeditions and sailing, piloting, parabolic flight, desert-based surface analogues and mountaineering expeditions. It is important to highlight that these results do not diminish the utility of other analogues; instead, the EFCSA helps to identify specific purposes for which analogues are useful, and serves as a means to improve analogue realism.

Frontiers in Space TechnologiesVol. 6
King's College London (GB), Aerospace Medical Association (US), Center for Advanced Studies Research and Development in Sardinia (IT), Department of Space (IN), Human Factors (Norway) (NO), Osys Technology (GB), University College London (GB), Goldsmiths University of London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Spaceflight effects on biology
2.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.