How does scientific research influence policymaking? A study of four types of citation pathways between research articles and <scp>AI</scp> policy documents

Abstract The importance of evidence‐based policymaking is widely recognized, but how science influences policy remains insufficiently explored. This study aims to examine how policy documents cite research articles, thereby tracing the complex impact process of scientific research on policymaking. A conceptual model is proposed to classify four types of citation pathways by distinguishing between direct and indirect impacts and observing whether a reinforcement effect is present. To operationalize this model, we collected nearly 10 thousand policy documents related to artificial intelligence (AI) and over 1.6 million links between these policies and their referenced articles. A large‐scale data analysis and a case study were conducted. Results exhibit distinct citation pathways among specific types of institutions, geopolitical areas, and policy areas. Indirect influences emerge as an important mechanism. Research articles from EU countries primarily serve the policymaking of inter‐governmental organizations (IGOs) and the EU, while research articles from the USA significantly support both domestic and foreign policymaking. Notably, IGOs serve as key intermediaries, facilitating the indirect influence of research on policymaking. In addition, while the knowledge from the social sciences provides substantial support for policies in various areas, an increasing involvement of the natural sciences in the development of AI‐related policies is found.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.25006
Citations
6
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How does scientific research influence policymaking? A study of four types of citation pathways between research articles and AI policy documents

Ying Huang, Gunnar Sivertsen, Lin Zhang, Zhe Cao
6 citations
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
8.39
article

How does scientific research influence policymaking? A study of four types of citation pathways between research articles and AI policy documents

Ying Huang, Gunnar Sivertsen, Lin Zhang, Zhe Cao
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract The importance of evidence‐based policymaking is widely recognized, but how science influences policy remains insufficiently explored. This study aims to examine how policy documents cite research articles, thereby tracing the complex impact process of scientific research on policymaking. A conceptual model is proposed to classify four types of citation pathways by distinguishing between direct and indirect impacts and observing whether a reinforcement effect is present. To operationalize this model, we collected nearly 10 thousand policy documents related to artificial intelligence (AI) and over 1.6 million links between these policies and their referenced articles. A large‐scale data analysis and a case study were conducted. Results exhibit distinct citation pathways among specific types of institutions, geopolitical areas, and policy areas. Indirect influences emerge as an important mechanism. Research articles from EU countries primarily serve the policymaking of inter‐governmental organizations (IGOs) and the EU, while research articles from the USA significantly support both domestic and foreign policymaking. Notably, IGOs serve as key intermediaries, facilitating the indirect influence of research on policymaking. In addition, while the knowledge from the social sciences provides substantial support for policies in various areas, an increasing involvement of the natural sciences in the development of AI‐related policies is found.

Journal of the Association for Information Science and TechnologyVol. 76(10)
Wuhan University (CN), Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education (NO), KU Leuven (BE)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
8.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.