What Drives Market‐Oriented Trading of Resource and Environmental Elements: An Analysis Based on the Technology–Organization–Environment Framework

ABSTRACT The market‐oriented trading of resource and environmental elements is a key mechanism for optimizing the efficiency of environmental rights allocation. This study, based on the technology–organization–environment (TOE) framework, selects 30 resource and environmental element trading platforms in China as a research sample. Using the fuzzy‐set qualitative comparative analysis method, we explore the effective path combination driving resource and environmental element trading. The research results reveal five paths that can achieve high‐level resource and environmental element trading, which can be classified into three types: technology–organization, organization–environment, and rule‐based. Organizational regulatory factors play an indispensable role, regardless of path type. The conclusion of this study provides a useful reference for incentivizing resource and environmental elements transactions, helping improve the market operation efficiency of environmental rights and interests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3449
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Drives Market‐Oriented Trading of Resource and Environmental Elements: An Analysis Based on the Technology–Organization–Environment Framework

Zhongju Liao, Ke Chen
2 citations
Sustainable Development
Innovation and Knowledge Management
4.45
article

What Drives Market‐Oriented Trading of Resource and Environmental Elements: An Analysis Based on the Technology–Organization–Environment Framework

Zhongju Liao, Ke Chen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The market‐oriented trading of resource and environmental elements is a key mechanism for optimizing the efficiency of environmental rights allocation. This study, based on the technology–organization–environment (TOE) framework, selects 30 resource and environmental element trading platforms in China as a research sample. Using the fuzzy‐set qualitative comparative analysis method, we explore the effective path combination driving resource and environmental element trading. The research results reveal five paths that can achieve high‐level resource and environmental element trading, which can be classified into three types: technology–organization, organization–environment, and rule‐based. Organizational regulatory factors play an indispensable role, regardless of path type. The conclusion of this study provides a useful reference for incentivizing resource and environmental elements transactions, helping improve the market operation efficiency of environmental rights and interests.

Sustainable DevelopmentVol. 33(4)
Zhejiang Sci-Tech University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
4.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.