Techniques to mitigate lead migration for percutaneous trials of cervical spinal cord stimulation

Lead migration was primarily confined to the rostrocaudal axis with the most migration occurring during the first week. Iterative improvements to the implantation procedure were implemented to increase lead stability across subjects. There was a decrease in lead migration for patients who had more rostral placement of the SCS leads. The average migration from the day of lead implant to lead removal was 29.7 mm for Subject 1 (lead placement ranging from T3-T4 to T1-T2), 41.9 mm for Subject 2 (T2-T3 to C7-T1), 1.9 mm for Subject 3 (T1-T2 to C7-T1), and 16.6 mm for Subject 4 (T1-T2 to C7-T1). We found that initial placement of spinal cord stimulator leads in the cervical epidural space as rostral as possible was critical to minimizing subsequent rostrocaudal lead migration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Surgery
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1458572
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Techniques to mitigate lead migration for percutaneous trials of cervical spinal cord stimulation

Jennifer L. Collinger, Michael L. Boninger, Lee E. Fisher, Jonathan N. Finney et al.
Frontiers in Surgery
Pain Management and Treatment
article

Techniques to mitigate lead migration for percutaneous trials of cervical spinal cord stimulation

Jennifer L. Collinger, Michael L. Boninger, Lee E. Fisher, Jonathan N. Finney, Eric R. Helm, Santosh Chandrasekaran, I. Martin Levy, Robert A. Gaunt
article en

Abstract

Lead migration was primarily confined to the rostrocaudal axis with the most migration occurring during the first week. Iterative improvements to the implantation procedure were implemented to increase lead stability across subjects. There was a decrease in lead migration for patients who had more rostral placement of the SCS leads. The average migration from the day of lead implant to lead removal was 29.7 mm for Subject 1 (lead placement ranging from T3-T4 to T1-T2), 41.9 mm for Subject 2 (T2-T3 to C7-T1), 1.9 mm for Subject 3 (T1-T2 to C7-T1), and 16.6 mm for Subject 4 (T1-T2 to C7-T1). We found that initial placement of spinal cord stimulator leads in the cervical epidural space as rostral as possible was critical to minimizing subsequent rostrocaudal lead migration.

Frontiers in SurgeryVol. 12
Northwell Health (US), Feinstein Institute for Medical Research (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), Interface (United States) (US), Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition (US), Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Pain Management and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Techniques to mitigate lead migration for percutaneous trials of cervical spinal cord stimulation — Jennifer L. Collinger, Michael L. Boninger, et al. · Frontiers in Surgery (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS