Economic Risks in the Development of Russia’s Southern Macroregion Amid Foreign Economic Sanctions

Traditional risk management in stock markets distinguishes between systematic and idiosyncratic risks, whereas regional economic risk is often assessed in aggregate. This study aims to analyse regional economic risk by distinguishing between systematic and idiosyncratic components to evaluate their impact on the stability of development in a constituent entity of the Russian Federation. The study employs statistical analysis using a modified CAPM model adapted for regional economies and content analysis of regulatory legal acts related to socio-economic transformation. The latter is conducted through a keyword registry based on industry classifications included in sanctions packages. The key contribution of this study lies in the development and validation of a methodology for calculating regional systematic and idiosyncratic risks, which serves as a basis for refining strategic development priorities for Russian regions. Systematic risk arises from macroeconomic factors beyond the control of individual regions, with sanctions exerting similar economy-wide effects. Idiosyncratic risk, by contrast, stems from sanctions targeting specific legal entities and individuals. Rostov and Volgograd Oblasts exhibit the highest dependence on nationwide economic conditions, while Sevastopol, the Republic of Kalmykia, and Astrakhan Oblast show lower systematic risk but higher idiosyncratic risk due to regional economic structures. Content analysis indicates shifts in the risk profile of the Southern Federal Okrug in response to imposed sanctions. From a policy perspective, regions with higher systematic risk require greater federal support. The findings help evaluate differences in systematic risk across regions and guide strategies to mitigate its impact through federal budget allocations. Future research could focus on identifying the main factors influencing idiosyncratic risk and creating a unified framework for risk assessment, from individual financial portfolios to the broader macroeconomic level.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Economy of Regions
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2025-1-3
Primary Topic
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Economic Risks in the Development of Russia’s Southern Macroregion Amid Foreign Economic Sanctions

Инна Митрофанова, Alla Kalinina, Tatiana Ivanova
Economy of Regions
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
article

Economic Risks in the Development of Russia’s Southern Macroregion Amid Foreign Economic Sanctions

Инна Митрофанова, Alla Kalinina, Tatiana Ivanova
article en

Abstract

Traditional risk management in stock markets distinguishes between systematic and idiosyncratic risks, whereas regional economic risk is often assessed in aggregate. This study aims to analyse regional economic risk by distinguishing between systematic and idiosyncratic components to evaluate their impact on the stability of development in a constituent entity of the Russian Federation. The study employs statistical analysis using a modified CAPM model adapted for regional economies and content analysis of regulatory legal acts related to socio-economic transformation. The latter is conducted through a keyword registry based on industry classifications included in sanctions packages. The key contribution of this study lies in the development and validation of a methodology for calculating regional systematic and idiosyncratic risks, which serves as a basis for refining strategic development priorities for Russian regions. Systematic risk arises from macroeconomic factors beyond the control of individual regions, with sanctions exerting similar economy-wide effects. Idiosyncratic risk, by contrast, stems from sanctions targeting specific legal entities and individuals. Rostov and Volgograd Oblasts exhibit the highest dependence on nationwide economic conditions, while Sevastopol, the Republic of Kalmykia, and Astrakhan Oblast show lower systematic risk but higher idiosyncratic risk due to regional economic structures. Content analysis indicates shifts in the risk profile of the Southern Federal Okrug in response to imposed sanctions. From a policy perspective, regions with higher systematic risk require greater federal support. The findings help evaluate differences in systematic risk across regions and guide strategies to mitigate its impact through federal budget allocations. Future research could focus on identifying the main factors influencing idiosyncratic risk and creating a unified framework for risk assessment, from individual financial portfolios to the broader macroeconomic level.

Economy of RegionsVol. 21(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.