Differentiation of Russia’s Regions in the Process of Reindustrialization

Russia’s regions are unevenly developed, which results in varying rates of reindustrialization across the country. This article investigates the regional differentiation in the process of reindustrialization, exploring its key factors and examining the unique economic and technological characteristics of different Russian regions. Reindustrialization is a crucial step in modernizing the economy; however, it faces challenges such as workforce qualification, infrastructure gaps, and institutional barriers, all of which contribute to significant regional disparities. The primary goal of this study is to identify the main causes and factors driving regional differences in reindustrialization and to highlight the key directions for this process. To analyse these dynamics, correlation and cluster analyses were employed to examine the relationships between production, scientific, and technological indicators. The correlation analysis revealed links between innovation expenditure, internal research and development costs, and the level of innovation activity in organizations. These findings demonstrate that innovation-supporting policies effectively increase funding for internal research and foster conditions conducive to innovative production, influenced by formal institutional frameworks. Clustering Russian regions according to their scientific, technological, and production potential revealed three distinct groups with varying levels and directions of reindustrialization. The first cluster (19 regions) exhibits the lowest levels of production and scientific-technological development; the second cluster (21 regions) shows relatively stronger scientific-technological factors, despite a weaker position in terms of production; and the third cluster (35 regions) demonstrates an average level of both production and technological development. In light of these findings, the study proposes that the regional differences in reindustrialization rates and directions call for tailored economic policies to effectively address these disparities and support more balanced development across Russia.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Economy of Regions
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2025-1-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Economic and Technological Developments in Russia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differentiation of Russia’s Regions in the Process of Reindustrialization

Vyacheslav Volchik, Elena Maslyukova, Anastasia A. Barunova, Olesia V. Demakhina
1 citations
Economy of Regions
Economic and Technological Developments in Russia
3.45
article

Differentiation of Russia’s Regions in the Process of Reindustrialization

Vyacheslav Volchik, Elena Maslyukova, Anastasia A. Barunova, Olesia V. Demakhina
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Russia’s regions are unevenly developed, which results in varying rates of reindustrialization across the country. This article investigates the regional differentiation in the process of reindustrialization, exploring its key factors and examining the unique economic and technological characteristics of different Russian regions. Reindustrialization is a crucial step in modernizing the economy; however, it faces challenges such as workforce qualification, infrastructure gaps, and institutional barriers, all of which contribute to significant regional disparities. The primary goal of this study is to identify the main causes and factors driving regional differences in reindustrialization and to highlight the key directions for this process. To analyse these dynamics, correlation and cluster analyses were employed to examine the relationships between production, scientific, and technological indicators. The correlation analysis revealed links between innovation expenditure, internal research and development costs, and the level of innovation activity in organizations. These findings demonstrate that innovation-supporting policies effectively increase funding for internal research and foster conditions conducive to innovative production, influenced by formal institutional frameworks. Clustering Russian regions according to their scientific, technological, and production potential revealed three distinct groups with varying levels and directions of reindustrialization. The first cluster (19 regions) exhibits the lowest levels of production and scientific-technological development; the second cluster (21 regions) shows relatively stronger scientific-technological factors, despite a weaker position in terms of production; and the third cluster (35 regions) demonstrates an average level of both production and technological development. In light of these findings, the study proposes that the regional differences in reindustrialization rates and directions call for tailored economic policies to effectively address these disparities and support more balanced development across Russia.

Economy of RegionsVol. 21(1)
Russian Science Foundation, Southern Federal University
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Economic and Technological Developments in Russia
3.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.