Axial Lumber Interbody Fusion as an Alternative “Salvage” Approach to Lumbosacral Fixation: A Case Series

<sec><title>Background</title> Lumbar interbody fusion is commonly performed to improve spinal stability in the context of degenerative, traumatic, and deformity-related pathologies. The axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) technique, also known as presacral interbody arthrodesis, is the only presacral interbody fusion technique approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. It is a rarely utilized approach to interbody fusion that aims to achieve fusion across L4 to L5 and/or L5 to S1 levels, which are the most susceptible to pseudoarthrosis and hardware failure. This case series describes the utility of the AxiaLIF procedure as a salvage approach when traditional interbody fusion techniques pose significant risks or are not feasible due to rare patient-specific factors. </sec><sec><title>Methods</title> All identifiable cases of the AxiaLIF procedure performed at a single, academic medical center were reviewed. Operative data were collected and each case presentation is described in detail. </sec><sec><title>Results</title> Six patients underwent AxiaLIF between July 2010 and May 2022. Indications for AxiaLIF as a salvage approach included hardware failure with a significant risk of recurrence with traditional revision techniques; a lack of segmental fixation at the distal end of the spinal construct; avoiding extensive tissue disruption in the setting of staged realignment surgery or previously compromised tissue; and comorbidities such as muscular dystrophy, abdominal hernias, and severe obesity. Two patients were fused solely across the L5 to S1 level, and 4 patients were fused from L4 to S1. The mean operative time, estimated blood loss, time under fluoroscopy, complications, and follow-up were noted. </sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title> This case series introduces the utility of AxiaLIF as a salvage approach. We believe the AxiaLIF procedure may be a valuable alternative to traditional lumbar interbody fusion in salvage situations when traditional techniques are not feasible or pose significant risk to the patient. In such situations, surgeon awareness of this approach has the potential to improve patient outcomes and safety. </sec><sec><title>Clinical Relevance</title> AxiaLIF, as a salvage approach, has the potential to improve patient outcomes safely when other surgical options pose significant risk or are not feasible. </sec><sec><title>Level of Evidence</title> 4. </sec>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Spine Surgery
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14444/8728
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Axial Lumber Interbody Fusion as an Alternative “Salvage” Approach to Lumbosacral Fixation: A Case Series

William Francis Lavelle, Richard A. Tallarico, John Panzone, Sean Cannizzaro et al.
The International Journal of Spine Surgery
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Axial Lumber Interbody Fusion as an Alternative “Salvage” Approach to Lumbosacral Fixation: A Case Series

William Francis Lavelle, Richard A. Tallarico, John Panzone, Sean Cannizzaro, Paul D Korytkowski
article en

Abstract

<sec><title>Background</title> Lumbar interbody fusion is commonly performed to improve spinal stability in the context of degenerative, traumatic, and deformity-related pathologies. The axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) technique, also known as presacral interbody arthrodesis, is the only presacral interbody fusion technique approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. It is a rarely utilized approach to interbody fusion that aims to achieve fusion across L4 to L5 and/or L5 to S1 levels, which are the most susceptible to pseudoarthrosis and hardware failure. This case series describes the utility of the AxiaLIF procedure as a salvage approach when traditional interbody fusion techniques pose significant risks or are not feasible due to rare patient-specific factors. </sec><sec><title>Methods</title> All identifiable cases of the AxiaLIF procedure performed at a single, academic medical center were reviewed. Operative data were collected and each case presentation is described in detail. </sec><sec><title>Results</title> Six patients underwent AxiaLIF between July 2010 and May 2022. Indications for AxiaLIF as a salvage approach included hardware failure with a significant risk of recurrence with traditional revision techniques; a lack of segmental fixation at the distal end of the spinal construct; avoiding extensive tissue disruption in the setting of staged realignment surgery or previously compromised tissue; and comorbidities such as muscular dystrophy, abdominal hernias, and severe obesity. Two patients were fused solely across the L5 to S1 level, and 4 patients were fused from L4 to S1. The mean operative time, estimated blood loss, time under fluoroscopy, complications, and follow-up were noted. </sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title> This case series introduces the utility of AxiaLIF as a salvage approach. We believe the AxiaLIF procedure may be a valuable alternative to traditional lumbar interbody fusion in salvage situations when traditional techniques are not feasible or pose significant risk to the patient. In such situations, surgeon awareness of this approach has the potential to improve patient outcomes and safety. </sec><sec><title>Clinical Relevance</title> AxiaLIF, as a salvage approach, has the potential to improve patient outcomes safely when other surgical options pose significant risk or are not feasible. </sec><sec><title>Level of Evidence</title> 4. </sec>

The International Journal of Spine SurgeryVol. 19(3)
SUNY Upstate Medical University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.