The convex combination rule and its relationship to Gini coefficient in the problem of degressively proportional allocation

Depending on the extent of agents’ entitlements, their desires about the outcome of the allocation of goods are distinct and asymmetric. Based on egalitarian concepts, agents with smaller entitlements tend to perceive equality as absolute equality, whereas those with larger entitlements tend to perceive it as equality of representation, i.e., proportionality. A concept which conciliates these asymmetric desires is the principle of degressively proportional goods allocation. Under this principle, both the interests of agents with small and large entitlements are protected. However, this is only a general principle and not a definite rule that allows for an unambiguous solution for each allocation problem. The following paper indicates a family of allocation rules, which, through a direct relationship with the Gini coefficient, allows for inequality control in the received allocation. Additionally, an allocation was shown in this family which reflects, as much as possible, the diversification of allocation satisfaction regarding the entitlements of all agents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Economic Design
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10058-025-00377-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mathematical Inequalities and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The convex combination rule and its relationship to Gini coefficient in the problem of degressively proportional allocation

Janusz Łyko, Katarzyna Cegiełka, Rafał Olejnik
1 citations
Review of Economic Design
Mathematical Inequalities and Applications
3.73
article

The convex combination rule and its relationship to Gini coefficient in the problem of degressively proportional allocation

Janusz Łyko, Katarzyna Cegiełka, Rafał Olejnik
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Depending on the extent of agents’ entitlements, their desires about the outcome of the allocation of goods are distinct and asymmetric. Based on egalitarian concepts, agents with smaller entitlements tend to perceive equality as absolute equality, whereas those with larger entitlements tend to perceive it as equality of representation, i.e., proportionality. A concept which conciliates these asymmetric desires is the principle of degressively proportional goods allocation. Under this principle, both the interests of agents with small and large entitlements are protected. However, this is only a general principle and not a definite rule that allows for an unambiguous solution for each allocation problem. The following paper indicates a family of allocation rules, which, through a direct relationship with the Gini coefficient, allows for inequality control in the received allocation. Additionally, an allocation was shown in this family which reflects, as much as possible, the diversification of allocation satisfaction regarding the entitlements of all agents.

Review of Economic DesignVol. 29(4)
Wroclaw University of Economics and Business (PL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Mathematical Inequalities and Applications
3.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The convex combination rule and its relationship to Gini coefficient in the problem of degressively proportional allocation — Janusz Łyko, Katarzyna Cegiełka, et al. · Review of Economic Design (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS