The perceptual and biomechanical effects of scaling back exosuit assistance to changing task demands

Back exoskeletons are gaining attention for preventing occupational back injuries, but they can disrupt movement, a burden that risks abandonment. Enhanced adaptability is proposed to mitigate burdens, but perceptual benefits are less known. This study investigates the perceptual and biomechanical impacts of a SLACK suit (non-assistive) controller versus three controllers with varying adaptability: a Weight-Direction-Angle adaptive (WDA-ADPT) that scales assistance based on the weight of the boxes using a chest-mounted camera and machine learning algorithm, movement direction, and trunk flexion angle, and standard Direction-Angle adaptive (DA-ADPT) and Angle adaptive (A-ADPT) controllers. Fifteen participants performed a variable weight (2, 8, 14 kg) box-transfer task. WDA-ADPT achieved the highest perceptual score (88%) across survey categories and reduced peak back extensor (BE) muscle amplitudes by 10.1%. DA-ADPT had slightly lower perceptual (76%) and peak BE reduction (8.5%). A-ADPT induced hip restriction, which could explain the lowest perceptual score (55%) despite providing the largest reductions in peak BE muscle activity (17.3%). Reduced perceptual scores achieved by DA and A-ADPT were explained by controllers providing too much or little assistance versus actual task demands. These findings underscore that scaling assistance to task demands improves biomechanical benefits and the perception of the device's suitability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94726-3
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The perceptual and biomechanical effects of scaling back exosuit assistance to changing task demands

Jason M. Cherin, Conor J. Walsh, D. Adam Quirk, Daekyum Kim et al.
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
1.35
article

The perceptual and biomechanical effects of scaling back exosuit assistance to changing task demands

Jason M. Cherin, Conor J. Walsh, D. Adam Quirk, Daekyum Kim, Daniel Friedrich, Jinwon Chung
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Back exoskeletons are gaining attention for preventing occupational back injuries, but they can disrupt movement, a burden that risks abandonment. Enhanced adaptability is proposed to mitigate burdens, but perceptual benefits are less known. This study investigates the perceptual and biomechanical impacts of a SLACK suit (non-assistive) controller versus three controllers with varying adaptability: a Weight-Direction-Angle adaptive (WDA-ADPT) that scales assistance based on the weight of the boxes using a chest-mounted camera and machine learning algorithm, movement direction, and trunk flexion angle, and standard Direction-Angle adaptive (DA-ADPT) and Angle adaptive (A-ADPT) controllers. Fifteen participants performed a variable weight (2, 8, 14 kg) box-transfer task. WDA-ADPT achieved the highest perceptual score (88%) across survey categories and reduced peak back extensor (BE) muscle amplitudes by 10.1%. DA-ADPT had slightly lower perceptual (76%) and peak BE reduction (8.5%). A-ADPT induced hip restriction, which could explain the lowest perceptual score (55%) despite providing the largest reductions in peak BE muscle activity (17.3%). Reduced perceptual scores achieved by DA and A-ADPT were explained by controllers providing too much or little assistance versus actual task demands. These findings underscore that scaling assistance to task demands improves biomechanical benefits and the perception of the device's suitability.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Harvard University (US), Korea University (KR)
U.S. Department of Defense, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.