Gen Z and Group Work: How Communication Styles Affect Free-Riding Behaviours

This study examines the effect of communication styles on free-riding behaviours in group work among Generation Z (Gen Z) undergraduate students. A mixed-methods approach was employed, which included quantitative survey data from 186 undergraduate students in Malaysia and qualitative insights gathered from 24 students through focus groups. Findings indicate significant differences in free-riding experiences across groups with varying communication styles. Students exhibiting passive and passive-aggressive communication styles were noted to have higher levels of free-riding behaviours. Conversely, those demonstrating assertive communication showed substantially lower instances of free riding. Qualitative analysis further reveals the influence of technology preferences, conflict avoidance, and accountability challenges on the prevalence of free-riding behaviours. Digital communication, as favoured by this generation combined with a tendency to avoid confrontation, was found to increase unequal participation in group tasks. The study demonstrates the significance of creating a structured environment with clear expectations to address free-riding behaviours. There is also a need to establish ways to promote transparent collaboration practices beyond peer evaluation to enhance the effectiveness of group work. These findings contribute to developing pedagogical strategies to improve collaborative learning experiences and prepare Generation Z students for successful teamwork in both academic and professional contexts. Keywords: Free riding, Gen Z, group work, communication styles, social loafing.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Komunikasi Malaysian Journal of Communication
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17576/jkmjc-2025-4101-24
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Generational Differences and Trends
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gen Z and Group Work: How Communication Styles Affect Free-Riding Behaviours

Looi-Chin Ch’ng, Radina Mohamad Deli, Kee-Man Chuah
2 citations
Jurnal Komunikasi Malaysian Journal of Communication
Generational Differences and Trends
9.56
article

Gen Z and Group Work: How Communication Styles Affect Free-Riding Behaviours

Looi-Chin Ch’ng, Radina Mohamad Deli, Kee-Man Chuah
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study examines the effect of communication styles on free-riding behaviours in group work among Generation Z (Gen Z) undergraduate students. A mixed-methods approach was employed, which included quantitative survey data from 186 undergraduate students in Malaysia and qualitative insights gathered from 24 students through focus groups. Findings indicate significant differences in free-riding experiences across groups with varying communication styles. Students exhibiting passive and passive-aggressive communication styles were noted to have higher levels of free-riding behaviours. Conversely, those demonstrating assertive communication showed substantially lower instances of free riding. Qualitative analysis further reveals the influence of technology preferences, conflict avoidance, and accountability challenges on the prevalence of free-riding behaviours. Digital communication, as favoured by this generation combined with a tendency to avoid confrontation, was found to increase unequal participation in group tasks. The study demonstrates the significance of creating a structured environment with clear expectations to address free-riding behaviours. There is also a need to establish ways to promote transparent collaboration practices beyond peer evaluation to enhance the effectiveness of group work. These findings contribute to developing pedagogical strategies to improve collaborative learning experiences and prepare Generation Z students for successful teamwork in both academic and professional contexts. Keywords: Free riding, Gen Z, group work, communication styles, social loafing.

Jurnal Komunikasi Malaysian Journal of CommunicationVol. 41(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Generational Differences and Trends
9.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.