Evaluation of deep learning models for flood forecasting in Bangladesh

Flooding is a recurrent and devastating issue in Bangladesh, largely due to its geographical and climatic conditions. This study examined the performance of four deep learning architectures Feed-forward Neural Network (FNN), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) in predicting floods in Bangladesh. Utilizing a binary classification dataset of historical meteorological and hydrological data, the findings revealed that GRU outperformed the other models, achieving an accuracy of 98%, a precision of 99%, a recall of 98%, and an F1-score of 99%. In contrast, LSTM attained an accuracy of 96%, a precision of 99%, a recall of 95%, and an F1-score of 97%. These results underscored the effectiveness of GRU for operational flood forecasting, which was critical for enhancing disaster preparedness in the region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computer Sciences Institute
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.6773
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of deep learning models for flood forecasting in Bangladesh

Asif Rahman Rumee
Journal of Computer Sciences Institute
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

Evaluation of deep learning models for flood forecasting in Bangladesh

Asif Rahman Rumee
article en

Abstract

Flooding is a recurrent and devastating issue in Bangladesh, largely due to its geographical and climatic conditions. This study examined the performance of four deep learning architectures Feed-forward Neural Network (FNN), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) in predicting floods in Bangladesh. Utilizing a binary classification dataset of historical meteorological and hydrological data, the findings revealed that GRU outperformed the other models, achieving an accuracy of 98%, a precision of 99%, a recall of 98%, and an F1-score of 99%. In contrast, LSTM attained an accuracy of 96%, a precision of 99%, a recall of 95%, and an F1-score of 97%. These results underscored the effectiveness of GRU for operational flood forecasting, which was critical for enhancing disaster preparedness in the region.

Journal of Computer Sciences InstituteVol. 34
Jerash University (JO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.