Simulation of Spring Discharge Using Deep Learning, Considering the Spatiotemporal Variability of Precipitation

Abstract Sparse precipitation data in karst catchments challenge hydrologic models to accurately capture the spatial and temporal relationships between precipitation and karst spring discharge, hindering robust predictions. This study addresses this issue by employing a coupled deep learning model that integrates a variation autoencoder (VAE) for augmenting precipitation and a long short‐term memory (LSTM) network for karst spring discharge prediction. The VAE contributes by generating synthetic precipitation data through an encoding‐decoding process. This process generalizes the observed precipitation data by deriving joint latent distributions with improved preservation of temporal and spatial correlations of the data. The combined VAE‐generated precipitation and observation data are used to train and test the LSTM to predict spring discharge. Applied to the Niangziguan spring catchment in northern China, the average performance of NSE, root mean square error, mean absolute error, mean absolute percentage error, and log NSE of our coupled VAE/LSTM model reached 0.93, 0.26, 0.15, 1.8, and 0.92, respectively, yielding 145%, 52%, 63%, 70% and 149% higher than an LSTM model using only observations. We also explored temporal and spatial correlations in the observed data and the impact of different ratios of VAE‐generated precipitation data to actual data on model performances. This study also evaluated the effectiveness of VAE‐augmented data on various deep‐learning models and compared VAE with other data augmentation techniques. We demonstrate that the VAE offers a novel approach to address data scarcity and uncertainty, improving learning generalization and predictive capability of various hydrological models. However, we recognize that innovations to address hydrologic problems at different scales remain to be explored.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Resources Research
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024wr037449
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simulation of Spring Discharge Using Deep Learning, Considering the Spatiotemporal Variability of Precipitation

Huiqing Hao, Dong Jian-kang, Tian‐Chyi Jim Yeh, Yonghong Hao et al.
4 citations
Water Resources Research
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
4.42
article

Simulation of Spring Discharge Using Deep Learning, Considering the Spatiotemporal Variability of Precipitation

Huiqing Hao, Dong Jian-kang, Tian‐Chyi Jim Yeh, Yonghong Hao, Chunmei Ma, Haoyu Jiao, Jiahui Lu, Junfeng Zhu
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Sparse precipitation data in karst catchments challenge hydrologic models to accurately capture the spatial and temporal relationships between precipitation and karst spring discharge, hindering robust predictions. This study addresses this issue by employing a coupled deep learning model that integrates a variation autoencoder (VAE) for augmenting precipitation and a long short‐term memory (LSTM) network for karst spring discharge prediction. The VAE contributes by generating synthetic precipitation data through an encoding‐decoding process. This process generalizes the observed precipitation data by deriving joint latent distributions with improved preservation of temporal and spatial correlations of the data. The combined VAE‐generated precipitation and observation data are used to train and test the LSTM to predict spring discharge. Applied to the Niangziguan spring catchment in northern China, the average performance of NSE, root mean square error, mean absolute error, mean absolute percentage error, and log NSE of our coupled VAE/LSTM model reached 0.93, 0.26, 0.15, 1.8, and 0.92, respectively, yielding 145%, 52%, 63%, 70% and 149% higher than an LSTM model using only observations. We also explored temporal and spatial correlations in the observed data and the impact of different ratios of VAE‐generated precipitation data to actual data on model performances. This study also evaluated the effectiveness of VAE‐augmented data on various deep‐learning models and compared VAE with other data augmentation techniques. We demonstrate that the VAE offers a novel approach to address data scarcity and uncertainty, improving learning generalization and predictive capability of various hydrological models. However, we recognize that innovations to address hydrologic problems at different scales remain to be explored.

Water Resources ResearchVol. 61(4)
United States Geological Survey (US), University of Arizona (US), University of Kentucky (US), Tianjin Normal University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
4.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.