Environmental factors influencing ground-nesting bee communities in an urban landscape: implications for conservation

Abstract Habitat loss and degradation of nesting habitats due to agricultural and urban development is considered one of the key factors causing pollinator decline worldwide. Nesting habitat requirements and availability is a strong determinant to which wild bee species are prevailing in urban spaces and knowledge of habitat requirements is therefore fundamental for successful conservation management. Although urban environments can host relatively diverse wild bee communities, ground-nesting bees and associated cleptoparasitic bees are disadvantaged, primarily due to a scarcity of suitable nesting resources. Further, conservation efforts for wild bee habitat (re)creation are largely focused on aerial nesters, despite the proportionally greater diversity and higher vulnerability of ground-nesting bees. The aim of this study was to investigate how environmental factors, including the age and size of sand patches, sand grain size, soil temperature, and the proportion of ground litter-cover vs. bare ground, have shaped ground-nesting bee community structure in an urban landscape. This was done by evaluating wild bee diversity and abundance across various sites with a range of qualities in Uppsala, Sweden. This study revealed a drastic 85% loss of suitable sandy habitat over a 75-year period due to urbanization. Based on the results of this study, we recommend a conservation approach for urban developers to lessen the negative impacts of urbanization on wild bee diversity and abundance. This includes the establishment of numerous bare ground sandy sites with medium size sand grain, and periodical management of vegetation to sustain bare sandy soil patches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Ecosystems
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-025-01706-6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental factors influencing ground-nesting bee communities in an urban landscape: implications for conservation

Barbara Locke, Lina A. Widenfalk, Mats Jonsell, Indré Cepukaitè et al.
1 citations
Urban Ecosystems
Plant and animal studies
3.03
article

Environmental factors influencing ground-nesting bee communities in an urban landscape: implications for conservation

Barbara Locke, Lina A. Widenfalk, Mats Jonsell, Indré Cepukaitè, Anders Björkén
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Habitat loss and degradation of nesting habitats due to agricultural and urban development is considered one of the key factors causing pollinator decline worldwide. Nesting habitat requirements and availability is a strong determinant to which wild bee species are prevailing in urban spaces and knowledge of habitat requirements is therefore fundamental for successful conservation management. Although urban environments can host relatively diverse wild bee communities, ground-nesting bees and associated cleptoparasitic bees are disadvantaged, primarily due to a scarcity of suitable nesting resources. Further, conservation efforts for wild bee habitat (re)creation are largely focused on aerial nesters, despite the proportionally greater diversity and higher vulnerability of ground-nesting bees. The aim of this study was to investigate how environmental factors, including the age and size of sand patches, sand grain size, soil temperature, and the proportion of ground litter-cover vs. bare ground, have shaped ground-nesting bee community structure in an urban landscape. This was done by evaluating wild bee diversity and abundance across various sites with a range of qualities in Uppsala, Sweden. This study revealed a drastic 85% loss of suitable sandy habitat over a 75-year period due to urbanization. Based on the results of this study, we recommend a conservation approach for urban developers to lessen the negative impacts of urbanization on wild bee diversity and abundance. This includes the establishment of numerous bare ground sandy sites with medium size sand grain, and periodical management of vegetation to sustain bare sandy soil patches.

Urban EcosystemsVol. 28(3)
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Plant and animal studies
3.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.