Geomechanical modeling and wellbore stability analysis for studying the shale rock failure

Wellbore stability constitutes a critical challenge that can precipitate an escalation in non-productive time (NPT) during drilling operations, subsequently resulting in an increase in well expenditures and consequent revenue deficits. Shale formations exhibit a greater propensity than many geological formations to induce complications during the drilling process. Consequently, advanced geomechanical analyses were executed on select wells within the Zubair oilfield to clarify the fundamental causes of instability predominant in the field. In this study, the model was applied to two specific wells (ZB-A and ZB-B) to perform a wellbore stability assessment utilizing available well log data, which includes parameters such as bit size (BS), caliber (CAL), shear sonic logs (DTS), compressional sonic logs (DTC), and gamma ray (GR) logs. Laboratory-derived data in addition to the minimum horizontal stress that were refined using the leak-off test (LOT) measurements. The predicted formation pore pressures were calibrated against the pore pressure readings obtained from a repeated formation tester (RFT). The Mogi-Coulomb failure criteria were employed to ascertain the safe operating mud window requisite for balanced drilling, owing to the criterion's capacity to accommodate the intermediate principal stress (σ2). The proposed mud weight values, derived from the model, range from 1.32 g/cc to 1.45 g/cc, whereas a mud weight of 1.19 g/cc was utilized during the drilling operations. The findings of this research can be used as a guide to choose the best mud weight to solve problems related to wellbore instabilities in this field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31699/ijcpe.2025.1.4
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geomechanical modeling and wellbore stability analysis for studying the shale rock failure

Ashkan Noori, Farqad Hadi
1 links
Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
article

Geomechanical modeling and wellbore stability analysis for studying the shale rock failure

Ashkan Noori, Farqad Hadi
article en

Abstract

Wellbore stability constitutes a critical challenge that can precipitate an escalation in non-productive time (NPT) during drilling operations, subsequently resulting in an increase in well expenditures and consequent revenue deficits. Shale formations exhibit a greater propensity than many geological formations to induce complications during the drilling process. Consequently, advanced geomechanical analyses were executed on select wells within the Zubair oilfield to clarify the fundamental causes of instability predominant in the field. In this study, the model was applied to two specific wells (ZB-A and ZB-B) to perform a wellbore stability assessment utilizing available well log data, which includes parameters such as bit size (BS), caliber (CAL), shear sonic logs (DTS), compressional sonic logs (DTC), and gamma ray (GR) logs. Laboratory-derived data in addition to the minimum horizontal stress that were refined using the leak-off test (LOT) measurements. The predicted formation pore pressures were calibrated against the pore pressure readings obtained from a repeated formation tester (RFT). The Mogi-Coulomb failure criteria were employed to ascertain the safe operating mud window requisite for balanced drilling, owing to the criterion's capacity to accommodate the intermediate principal stress (σ2). The proposed mud weight values, derived from the model, range from 1.32 g/cc to 1.45 g/cc, whereas a mud weight of 1.19 g/cc was utilized during the drilling operations. The findings of this research can be used as a guide to choose the best mud weight to solve problems related to wellbore instabilities in this field.

Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum EngineeringVol. 26(1)
University of Baghdad (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.