Best practices for physiological data collection in youth with autism and co-occurring mental health diagnoses: Implications for human-animal intervention research

The purpose of this paper is to serve as a catalyst for the human-animal interaction research field to improve scientific rigor and accelerate the knowledge of field-based physiological responses during equine-assisted services in youth with autism spectrum disorder. This paper outlines the best practices for collecting and analyzing electrocardiogram and electrodermal activity in youth with autism spectrum disorder, utilized during a 10-week therapeutic horseback riding intervention.•Motivation strategies such as device choice, reward systems, and a visual schedule should be implemented to improve participant compliance. In addition, devices should be secured to the participant following implementation of appropriate desensitization techniques.•Time-domain heart rate variability analyses are more appropriate during therapeutic horseback riding data collection compared to frequency-domain approaches. For electrodermal activity, tonic responses should be assessed as opposed to phasic analyses.•An effective data monitoring team including the Data Collection Research Personnel, Site Principal Investigator, Physiologist, and Therapeutic Riding Center Intervention Lead are key to increasing the quality of usable data in equine-assisted service research environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MethodsX
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2025.103284
Primary Topic
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Best practices for physiological data collection in youth with autism and co-occurring mental health diagnoses: Implications for human-animal intervention research

Matthew Siegel, Robin L. Gabriels, Zhaoxing Pan, Tamara Merritt et al.
1 links
MethodsX
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
article

Best practices for physiological data collection in youth with autism and co-occurring mental health diagnoses: Implications for human-animal intervention research

Matthew Siegel, Robin L. Gabriels, Zhaoxing Pan, Tamara Merritt, Hannah Christensen, Cory M. Smith, Katharine Weimann, Madison Widick
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to serve as a catalyst for the human-animal interaction research field to improve scientific rigor and accelerate the knowledge of field-based physiological responses during equine-assisted services in youth with autism spectrum disorder. This paper outlines the best practices for collecting and analyzing electrocardiogram and electrodermal activity in youth with autism spectrum disorder, utilized during a 10-week therapeutic horseback riding intervention.•Motivation strategies such as device choice, reward systems, and a visual schedule should be implemented to improve participant compliance. In addition, devices should be secured to the participant following implementation of appropriate desensitization techniques.•Time-domain heart rate variability analyses are more appropriate during therapeutic horseback riding data collection compared to frequency-domain approaches. For electrodermal activity, tonic responses should be assessed as opposed to phasic analyses.•An effective data monitoring team including the Data Collection Research Personnel, Site Principal Investigator, Physiologist, and Therapeutic Riding Center Intervention Lead are key to increasing the quality of usable data in equine-assisted service research environments.

MethodsXVol. 14
Tufts University (US), Boston Children's Hospital (US), Baylor University (US), Heart Foundation (US), Children's Hospital Colorado (US), University of Montana (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Human Animal Bond Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.