Same‐sex marriage legislation and implementation: Marital intention and barriers for marriage actualization among same‐sex couples in Asia

Abstract Objective This paper explores the power and limits of same‐sex marriage legislation by examining the rationales behind same‐sex couples' marital intentions and barriers to actualization in Asian societies. Background Marriage equality is seen as a milestone for lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, and plus (LGBQ+) rights. However, beyond its symbolic importance, how does this policy affect LGBQ+ people's lives? Method A mixed‐method comparative study, with 647 survey responses and 70 interviews, was conducted with LGBQ+ people in committed same‐sex relationships who live in Taipei (the first in Asia to legalize same‐sex marriage) and Hong Kong (without the policy). Results Legal protection is one of the pivotal reasons behind same‐sex couples' marital intentions. However, the policy implementation might jeopardize their privacy and expose them to discrimination. The increase in visibility associated with Taiwan's documentation systems and public debates make LGBQ+ people feel as though they were “living under the spotlight,” invoking unwanted and unfriendly attention from strangers and co‐workers. Paradoxically, despite the lack of legal protection, LGBQ+ people in Hong Kong could “live in the shadows” to avoid negative consequences amidst unfriendly environments. Conclusion Same‐sex marriage legalization can be a double‐edged sword; it provides legal protection while bringing challenges for same‐sex couples. This study contributes to the literature on LGBQ+ rights after marriage equality and sexual citizenship beyond the Global North. Implications Documentation systems in Taiwan that reveal one's marital status and sexual orientation demonstrate the need for privacy considerations and address the unique situation of LGBQ+ people when implementing same‐sex marriage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marriage and the Family
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.13095
Citations
2
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Same‐sex marriage legislation and implementation: Marital intention and barriers for marriage actualization among same‐sex couples in Asia

Eliz Miu Yin Wong
2 citations
Journal of Marriage and the Family
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
4.88
article

Same‐sex marriage legislation and implementation: Marital intention and barriers for marriage actualization among same‐sex couples in Asia

Eliz Miu Yin Wong
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objective This paper explores the power and limits of same‐sex marriage legislation by examining the rationales behind same‐sex couples' marital intentions and barriers to actualization in Asian societies. Background Marriage equality is seen as a milestone for lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, and plus (LGBQ+) rights. However, beyond its symbolic importance, how does this policy affect LGBQ+ people's lives? Method A mixed‐method comparative study, with 647 survey responses and 70 interviews, was conducted with LGBQ+ people in committed same‐sex relationships who live in Taipei (the first in Asia to legalize same‐sex marriage) and Hong Kong (without the policy). Results Legal protection is one of the pivotal reasons behind same‐sex couples' marital intentions. However, the policy implementation might jeopardize their privacy and expose them to discrimination. The increase in visibility associated with Taiwan's documentation systems and public debates make LGBQ+ people feel as though they were “living under the spotlight,” invoking unwanted and unfriendly attention from strangers and co‐workers. Paradoxically, despite the lack of legal protection, LGBQ+ people in Hong Kong could “live in the shadows” to avoid negative consequences amidst unfriendly environments. Conclusion Same‐sex marriage legalization can be a double‐edged sword; it provides legal protection while bringing challenges for same‐sex couples. This study contributes to the literature on LGBQ+ rights after marriage equality and sexual citizenship beyond the Global North. Implications Documentation systems in Taiwan that reveal one's marital status and sexual orientation demonstrate the need for privacy considerations and address the unique situation of LGBQ+ people when implementing same‐sex marriage.

Journal of Marriage and the FamilyVol. 87(4)
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
London School of Economics and Political Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
4.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.