Post-Marketing Drug Safety Sources: An Evaluation of the FDA’s Drug Safety Communications in the Past 10 Years

Abstract Background: The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regularly disseminates Drug Safety Communications (DSCs) to inform healthcare professionals and consumers about important safety concerns related to marketed medicinal products. These communications usually contain evidence used to support regulatory decision-making. Objectives: This study reviews and assesses the association between the types of data sources utilized in DSCs and subsequent regulatory actions from January 2015 to January 2024. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on all DSCs published on the FDA’s website from 2015 to 2024. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the characteristics of the DSCs, including the year of publication, medication therapeutic group, adverse events (AEs) categorized by system organ class, data sources, and regulatory actions. A univariate logistic regression was performed to assess the association between the evidence source type and the FDA’s regulatory actions. Results: A total of 87 DSCs met the inclusion criteria for the final analysis, with the highest number issued in 2015 (25.3%). The most frequently reported therapeutic classes included antidiabetic drugs (13.8%), analgesics/opioids (11.5%), and antipsychotics (6.9%). The top AEs by system organ class reported were cardiac disorders (14.9%). Label updates were the predominant regulatory action, accounting for 70.1% of cases. Univariate logistic regression analyses found no statistically significant association between spontaneous case reports as sources of the evidence and drug labeling updates (OR = 1.80; 95% CI [0.71, 4.54]; P = 0.21). However, DSCs that referenced two or more evidence sources were significantly more likely to result in a label update compared to those citing a single evidence source (OR = 2.91; 95% CI [1.12, 7.59]). Conclusion: Spontaneous reports and the number of cited observational studies were the most frequently utilized evidence sources in the FDA’s DSCs that led to drug labeling updates. These findings demonstrate the necessity for rigorous evidence integration in guiding regulatory decisions and enhancing drug safety monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Saudi Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/sjcp.sjcp_38_24
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Post-Marketing Drug Safety Sources: An Evaluation of the FDA’s Drug Safety Communications in the Past 10 Years

Fawaz Alharbi, Maha Alghamdi, Abdulaali R. Almutairi, Ghadah M. Alotaibi
2 citations
Saudi Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
2.61
article

Post-Marketing Drug Safety Sources: An Evaluation of the FDA’s Drug Safety Communications in the Past 10 Years

Fawaz Alharbi, Maha Alghamdi, Abdulaali R. Almutairi, Ghadah M. Alotaibi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background: The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regularly disseminates Drug Safety Communications (DSCs) to inform healthcare professionals and consumers about important safety concerns related to marketed medicinal products. These communications usually contain evidence used to support regulatory decision-making. Objectives: This study reviews and assesses the association between the types of data sources utilized in DSCs and subsequent regulatory actions from January 2015 to January 2024. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on all DSCs published on the FDA’s website from 2015 to 2024. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the characteristics of the DSCs, including the year of publication, medication therapeutic group, adverse events (AEs) categorized by system organ class, data sources, and regulatory actions. A univariate logistic regression was performed to assess the association between the evidence source type and the FDA’s regulatory actions. Results: A total of 87 DSCs met the inclusion criteria for the final analysis, with the highest number issued in 2015 (25.3%). The most frequently reported therapeutic classes included antidiabetic drugs (13.8%), analgesics/opioids (11.5%), and antipsychotics (6.9%). The top AEs by system organ class reported were cardiac disorders (14.9%). Label updates were the predominant regulatory action, accounting for 70.1% of cases. Univariate logistic regression analyses found no statistically significant association between spontaneous case reports as sources of the evidence and drug labeling updates (OR = 1.80; 95% CI [0.71, 4.54]; P = 0.21). However, DSCs that referenced two or more evidence sources were significantly more likely to result in a label update compared to those citing a single evidence source (OR = 2.91; 95% CI [1.12, 7.59]). Conclusion: Spontaneous reports and the number of cited observational studies were the most frequently utilized evidence sources in the FDA’s DSCs that led to drug labeling updates. These findings demonstrate the necessity for rigorous evidence integration in guiding regulatory decisions and enhancing drug safety monitoring.

Saudi Journal of Clinical PharmacyVol. 4(1)
Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
2.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.