Difference in Strategy and Clinical Outcomes of Left Main Disease in Japan and Non-Japanese Countries

Although state-of-the-art therapy for left main disease (LMD) has been demonstrated to improve overall cardiovascular outcomes, it remains unclear whether differences in strategy and outcomes for Japanese and non-Japanese patients can be observed in a contemporary treatment.In this international multicenter registry, we analyzed 314 patients who received state-of-the-art management for LMD, including physiology-guided revascularization, coronary interventions using the latest drug-eluting stents aided by intracoronary imaging, or surgical procedures employing internal thoracic artery grafts, in conjunction with guideline-directed medical therapy. The patient cohort was divided into Japanese (n = 122) and non-Japanese (n = 192) groups. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. Propensity score matching was utilized to account for baseline clinical variables.Baseline and lesion characteristics differed among groups, demonstrating higher frequency of diabetes and chronic kidney disease, higher SYNTAX score, and more severe stenosis in the Japanese cohort, resulting in a higher rate of revascularization performed (P < 0.05 for all). Percutaneous coronary intervention was significantly more frequently selected as the revascularization option (P < 0.001). While there were no significant differences in MACE between the 2 groups before adjustment, following adjustment, the Japanese cohort demonstrated significantly lower MACE at 4 years (6.3% versus 16.7%; HR: 0.37; 95%CI: 0.14-0.97; P = 0.042). Multivariate analysis further confirmed an independent association between Japanese patients and a reduced 4-year MACE risk (HR: 0.37; 95%CI: 0.14-0.96; P = 0.040).In a contemporary study with state-of-the-art therapy for LMD, patients who underwent treatment in Japan demonstrated better cardiovascular outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Heart Journal
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.24-375
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Difference in Strategy and Clinical Outcomes of Left Main Disease in Japan and Non-Japanese Countries

Rasha Al‐Lamee, Yousif Ahmad, Christopher Rajkumar, Shunichi Doi et al.
International Heart Journal
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Difference in Strategy and Clinical Outcomes of Left Main Disease in Japan and Non-Japanese Countries

Rasha Al‐Lamee, Yousif Ahmad, Christopher Rajkumar, Shunichi Doi, Akihiro Nakajima, Yuetsu Kikuta, Amir Lerman, Christopher Cook, James P. Howard, Yoshiaki Kawase, Yoshihiro J. Akashi, Sonoka Yuasa, Hidetaka Nishina, Javier Escaned, Takayuki Warisawa, Hitoshi Matsuo, Takumi Toya, Henry Seligman, Masafumi Nakayama, Justin E. Davies
article en

Abstract

Although state-of-the-art therapy for left main disease (LMD) has been demonstrated to improve overall cardiovascular outcomes, it remains unclear whether differences in strategy and outcomes for Japanese and non-Japanese patients can be observed in a contemporary treatment.In this international multicenter registry, we analyzed 314 patients who received state-of-the-art management for LMD, including physiology-guided revascularization, coronary interventions using the latest drug-eluting stents aided by intracoronary imaging, or surgical procedures employing internal thoracic artery grafts, in conjunction with guideline-directed medical therapy. The patient cohort was divided into Japanese (n = 122) and non-Japanese (n = 192) groups. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. Propensity score matching was utilized to account for baseline clinical variables.Baseline and lesion characteristics differed among groups, demonstrating higher frequency of diabetes and chronic kidney disease, higher SYNTAX score, and more severe stenosis in the Japanese cohort, resulting in a higher rate of revascularization performed (P < 0.05 for all). Percutaneous coronary intervention was significantly more frequently selected as the revascularization option (P < 0.001). While there were no significant differences in MACE between the 2 groups before adjustment, following adjustment, the Japanese cohort demonstrated significantly lower MACE at 4 years (6.3% versus 16.7%; HR: 0.37; 95%CI: 0.14-0.97; P = 0.042). Multivariate analysis further confirmed an independent association between Japanese patients and a reduced 4-year MACE risk (HR: 0.37; 95%CI: 0.14-0.96; P = 0.040).In a contemporary study with state-of-the-art therapy for LMD, patients who underwent treatment in Japan demonstrated better cardiovascular outcomes.

International Heart JournalVol. 66(2)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), St. Marianna University School of Medicine (JP), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), NTT Medical Center (JP), Hammersmith Hospital (GB), Harefield Hospital (GB), Hospital Clínico San Carlos (ES), Yale University (US), New Tokyo Hospital (JP), Lung Institute (US), Essex Cardiothoracic Centre (GB), Fukuyama Cardiovascular Hospital (JP), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital (JP), Gifu Heart Center (JP), Imperial College London (GB), Anglia Ruskin University (GB), National Defense Medical College (JP)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.