AI‐PAL: Self‐Supervised AI Phase Picking via Rule‐Based Algorithm for Generalized Earthquake Detection

Abstract Delineating fault structures through microseismicity is crucial for earthquake hazard assessment, yet constructing high‐resolution catalogs over extended periods remains challenging. This study introduces AI‐PAL, a novel deep learning‐driven workflow that employs a Self‐Attention RNN (SAR) model trained with detections from PAL, an established rule‐based algorithm (Zhou, Yue, et al., 2021, https://doi.org/10.1785/0220210111 ), for generalized earthquake detection. PAL utilizes short‐term‐average over long‐term‐average algorithm for event detection, ensuring consistent performance across different datasets. AI‐PAL leverages these rule‐based picks as training labels, enabling self‐supervised learning of the SAR model across arbitrary regions, thereby enhancing PAL's detection capabilities. We applied SAR‐PAL to two distinct regions that are featured by recent large earthquakes: (a) the preseismic period of the Ridgecrest‐Coso region (2008–2019), and (b) the pre‐to‐postseismic period of the East Anatolian Fault Zone (EAFZ, 2020–2023/04). Our results demonstrate that SAR‐PAL offers slightly higher detection completeness than the quake template matching matched filter catalog, while boosts over 100 times faster processing and a superior temporal stability, avoiding detection gaps during background periods. Compared to PhaseNet and GaMMA, two widely recognized phase picker and associator, SAR‐PAL proved more scalable, achieving ∼2.5 times more event detections in the EAFZ case, along with a ∼7 times higher phase association rate. We further experimented training PhaseNet and SAR with PAL detections and routine catalogs, and found that no other combinations matched the detection performance of SAR‐PAL. The enhanced catalogs built by SAR‐PAL reveals geometrical complexities of the Ridgecrest faults and the Erkenek‐Pütürge segment of EAFZ, offering insights into their contrasting roles during the large earthquake.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025jb031294
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
22.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI‐PAL: Self‐Supervised AI Phase Picking via Rule‐Based Algorithm for Generalized Earthquake Detection

Abhijit Ghosh, Hongyang Ding, Zengxi Ge, Yijian Zhou
9 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
22.33
article

AI‐PAL: Self‐Supervised AI Phase Picking via Rule‐Based Algorithm for Generalized Earthquake Detection

Abhijit Ghosh, Hongyang Ding, Zengxi Ge, Yijian Zhou
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Abstract Delineating fault structures through microseismicity is crucial for earthquake hazard assessment, yet constructing high‐resolution catalogs over extended periods remains challenging. This study introduces AI‐PAL, a novel deep learning‐driven workflow that employs a Self‐Attention RNN (SAR) model trained with detections from PAL, an established rule‐based algorithm (Zhou, Yue, et al., 2021, https://doi.org/10.1785/0220210111 ), for generalized earthquake detection. PAL utilizes short‐term‐average over long‐term‐average algorithm for event detection, ensuring consistent performance across different datasets. AI‐PAL leverages these rule‐based picks as training labels, enabling self‐supervised learning of the SAR model across arbitrary regions, thereby enhancing PAL's detection capabilities. We applied SAR‐PAL to two distinct regions that are featured by recent large earthquakes: (a) the preseismic period of the Ridgecrest‐Coso region (2008–2019), and (b) the pre‐to‐postseismic period of the East Anatolian Fault Zone (EAFZ, 2020–2023/04). Our results demonstrate that SAR‐PAL offers slightly higher detection completeness than the quake template matching matched filter catalog, while boosts over 100 times faster processing and a superior temporal stability, avoiding detection gaps during background periods. Compared to PhaseNet and GaMMA, two widely recognized phase picker and associator, SAR‐PAL proved more scalable, achieving ∼2.5 times more event detections in the EAFZ case, along with a ∼7 times higher phase association rate. We further experimented training PhaseNet and SAR with PAL detections and routine catalogs, and found that no other combinations matched the detection performance of SAR‐PAL. The enhanced catalogs built by SAR‐PAL reveals geometrical complexities of the Ridgecrest faults and the Erkenek‐Pütürge segment of EAFZ, offering insights into their contrasting roles during the large earthquake.

Journal of Geophysical Research Solid EarthVol. 130(4)
University of California, Riverside (US), California Institute of Technology (US), Peking University (CN)
University of California, Riverside
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
22.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.