Optimizing the MoSt GG model a sensitivity-driven calibration for better grass growth forecasting

• Identified ten key parameters influencing grass growth in the MoSt GG model. • Reduced prediction error (MAPE) from 30.0% to 19.8% using iterative calibration. • Improved prediction accuracy with R 2 increasing from 0.58 to 0.71 on calibration data. • Evaluated the calibrated model with R 2 of 0.67 and MAPE reduced to 19.1%. • Enhanced grass growth predictions to support better on-farm decision-making. Grasslands offer an efficient and eco-friendly way to produce high-quality feed for ruminants, benefiting both livestock production and human nutrition. However, its high sensitivity to its environment makes its management challenging for farmers. Predicting week ahead grass growth results in better-informed decision making on farms. The Moorepark St Gilles Grass Growth Model (MoSt GG) has been used since 2018 to predict weekly grass growth on grassland farms across Ireland with 84 farms involved in 2023. The repeated use of the model on these farms has identified a need to improve its accuracy, which has been addressed in this study. First, a sensitivity analysis using the Morris method was conducted to identify the parameters that have the most influence on the model’s grass growth output, both on an annual and monthly time step. From that analysis, ten parameters were selected, all of which related either to temperatures, day length or nitrogen demand and availability for the grass. These ten parameters were calibrated using a semi-automatic iterative method of calibration on a dataset of 14 commercial farms containing four years of grass measurements. Nine iterations were necessary to calibrate the model resulting in a reduction of MAPE from 30.0% to 19.8% in its final calibrated version, and notably increasing the final R 2 from 0.58 to 0.71. Finally, the model was evaluated over a new dataset of ten commercial farms for four years. The evaluation confirmed the improvement of the model with a final MAPE of 19.1% and a R 2 of 0.67 compared to 30.1% and 0.57 respectively before the calibration. The calibration process of the MoSt GG model has significantly improved the model accuracy to predict on farm grass growth. This improvement is expected to be particularly valuable for farmers in their decision making process, providing them with more reliable on farm grass growth predictions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2025.110288
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing the MoSt GG model a sensitivity-driven calibration for better grass growth forecasting

Luc Delaby, Michael D. Murphy, E. Ruelle, L. Bonnard
1 citations
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
0.80
article

Optimizing the MoSt GG model a sensitivity-driven calibration for better grass growth forecasting

Luc Delaby, Michael D. Murphy, E. Ruelle, L. Bonnard
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Identified ten key parameters influencing grass growth in the MoSt GG model. • Reduced prediction error (MAPE) from 30.0% to 19.8% using iterative calibration. • Improved prediction accuracy with R 2 increasing from 0.58 to 0.71 on calibration data. • Evaluated the calibrated model with R 2 of 0.67 and MAPE reduced to 19.1%. • Enhanced grass growth predictions to support better on-farm decision-making. Grasslands offer an efficient and eco-friendly way to produce high-quality feed for ruminants, benefiting both livestock production and human nutrition. However, its high sensitivity to its environment makes its management challenging for farmers. Predicting week ahead grass growth results in better-informed decision making on farms. The Moorepark St Gilles Grass Growth Model (MoSt GG) has been used since 2018 to predict weekly grass growth on grassland farms across Ireland with 84 farms involved in 2023. The repeated use of the model on these farms has identified a need to improve its accuracy, which has been addressed in this study. First, a sensitivity analysis using the Morris method was conducted to identify the parameters that have the most influence on the model’s grass growth output, both on an annual and monthly time step. From that analysis, ten parameters were selected, all of which related either to temperatures, day length or nitrogen demand and availability for the grass. These ten parameters were calibrated using a semi-automatic iterative method of calibration on a dataset of 14 commercial farms containing four years of grass measurements. Nine iterations were necessary to calibrate the model resulting in a reduction of MAPE from 30.0% to 19.8% in its final calibrated version, and notably increasing the final R 2 from 0.58 to 0.71. Finally, the model was evaluated over a new dataset of ten commercial farms for four years. The evaluation confirmed the improvement of the model with a final MAPE of 19.1% and a R 2 of 0.67 compared to 30.1% and 0.57 respectively before the calibration. The calibration process of the MoSt GG model has significantly improved the model accuracy to predict on farm grass growth. This improvement is expected to be particularly valuable for farmers in their decision making process, providing them with more reliable on farm grass growth predictions.

Computers and Electronics in AgricultureVol. 235
Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority (IE), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l'Animal et les Systèmes d'Elevage (FR), Munster Technological University (IE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.