Effects of feeding prickly pear by-product silage as a partial replacement of concentrate on dairy ewes: Milk characteristics, nutrient utilisation and in vitro ruminal fermentation

Prickly pear fruit processing industries generate a substantial amount of fibrous by-products as waste rich in bioactive compounds, including polyphenols and tannins, and that contain considerable minerals and water-soluble carbohydrates. This study investigated the potential of prickly pear by-product silage as feed in the diet of Valle del Belice ewes and its effects on body weight, milk yield and composition, nutrient utilisation and degradability and in vitro ruminal fermentation characteristics. A total of 12 ewes (60 d in lactation) were selected and randomly divided into three experimental groups, homogeneous for parity, live weight and milk yield. Each group was fed for 14 d (9 d for diet adaptation + 5 d for sampling), with one of the three experimental diets based on a Latin square design. The diets with the same crude protein and NDF were: 1) control (CTR) diet with hay and concentrate; 2) prickly pear peels (PPP) diet with PPP silage, hay and concentrate; and 3) pulp, peels and seeds (PPS) diet with PPS silage, hay and concentrate. Nutrient intake varied between diets, with total DM intake being greater in the CTR and PPS ( p < 0.01) diets than in the PPP diet. Daily milk yield tended to be lower in ewes fed the PPP and PPS diets than in those fed the CTR diet, whereas no differences were found for fat- and protein-corrected milk between diets. Protein and casein ( p ≤ 0.05) levels were higher in the milk of ewes fed the PPP diet. Compared with the milk urea concentration of CTR-fed ewes, that of PPP-fed ewes was 15 % lower. The in vivo nutrient degradability, in vitro fermentation rate and volatile FAs were greater ( p < 0.01) in the PPP diet than in the PPS diet. These results suggest that PPP silage can be partially incorporated into dairy ewe diets to reduce feeding costs and improve milk nitrogen efficiency. • Feeding prickly pear peel (PPP) silage affects ruminal fermentation. • PPP silage-based diet increased casein levels. • PPP silage-based diet reduced milk urea nitrogen levels. • PPP silage-based diet increased dry matter and organic matter degradability. • PPP silage-based diet increased in vitro fermentation rate and gas production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animal Feed Science and Technology
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116330
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of feeding prickly pear by-product silage as a partial replacement of concentrate on dairy ewes: Milk characteristics, nutrient utilisation and in vitro ruminal fermentation

Giuseppe Maniaci, Monica Isabella Cutrignelli, Massimo Todaro, Mahmood Ul Hassan et al.
6 citations
Animal Feed Science and Technology
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
11.42
article

Effects of feeding prickly pear by-product silage as a partial replacement of concentrate on dairy ewes: Milk characteristics, nutrient utilisation and in vitro ruminal fermentation

Giuseppe Maniaci, Monica Isabella Cutrignelli, Massimo Todaro, Mahmood Ul Hassan, Serena Calabrò, Isabella Mancuso, Alessandro Vastolo, Riccardo Gannuscio, Antonio Gallo
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Prickly pear fruit processing industries generate a substantial amount of fibrous by-products as waste rich in bioactive compounds, including polyphenols and tannins, and that contain considerable minerals and water-soluble carbohydrates. This study investigated the potential of prickly pear by-product silage as feed in the diet of Valle del Belice ewes and its effects on body weight, milk yield and composition, nutrient utilisation and degradability and in vitro ruminal fermentation characteristics. A total of 12 ewes (60 d in lactation) were selected and randomly divided into three experimental groups, homogeneous for parity, live weight and milk yield. Each group was fed for 14 d (9 d for diet adaptation + 5 d for sampling), with one of the three experimental diets based on a Latin square design. The diets with the same crude protein and NDF were: 1) control (CTR) diet with hay and concentrate; 2) prickly pear peels (PPP) diet with PPP silage, hay and concentrate; and 3) pulp, peels and seeds (PPS) diet with PPS silage, hay and concentrate. Nutrient intake varied between diets, with total DM intake being greater in the CTR and PPS ( p < 0.01) diets than in the PPP diet. Daily milk yield tended to be lower in ewes fed the PPP and PPS diets than in those fed the CTR diet, whereas no differences were found for fat- and protein-corrected milk between diets. Protein and casein ( p ≤ 0.05) levels were higher in the milk of ewes fed the PPP diet. Compared with the milk urea concentration of CTR-fed ewes, that of PPP-fed ewes was 15 % lower. The in vivo nutrient degradability, in vitro fermentation rate and volatile FAs were greater ( p < 0.01) in the PPP diet than in the PPS diet. These results suggest that PPP silage can be partially incorporated into dairy ewe diets to reduce feeding costs and improve milk nitrogen efficiency. • Feeding prickly pear peel (PPP) silage affects ruminal fermentation. • PPP silage-based diet increased casein levels. • PPP silage-based diet reduced milk urea nitrogen levels. • PPP silage-based diet increased dry matter and organic matter degradability. • PPP silage-based diet increased in vitro fermentation rate and gas production.

Animal Feed Science and TechnologyVol. 324
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Della Sicilia (IT), University of Naples Federico II (IT), University of Palermo (IT)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
11.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.