On the Possibility of Adding a Repeatability Requirement for the Indirect Verification of Charpy Machines in ASTM E23

Since 1989, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Charpy Machine Verification Program in Boulder, Colorado, has been indirectly verifying Charpy machines around the world according to ASTM E23, <i>Standard Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic Materials</i>, and ISO 148-2, <i>Metallic Materials</i>-<i>Charpy Pendulum Impact Test</i>-<i>Part 2: Verification of Testing Machines</i>. Most of the indirect verifications results have been logged in a database, which at the end of May 2024 included 77,105 records, each one corresponding to 4-5 absorbed energy values at one of three energy levels (low, high, and super-high). Based on the analysis of this database, the acceptability criteria of ASTM E23, exclusively based on bias, have been compared with those of ISO 148-2, which also include repeatability. The objective of this study is to support the proposal of revising ASTM E23 by introducing repeatability requirements in addition to the existing bias criteria. Four proposals have been considered and assessed, leading to the selection of a set of repeatability limits (larger of 4 J and 15 % of certified absorbed energy) that only moderately increases the severity of the standard but, most importantly, prevents deeming machines acceptable that satisfy ASTM E23 bias but fail ISO 148-2 repeatability (approximately one sixth of all the machines verified by the NIST since 1990).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials Performance and Characterization
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1520/mpc20240077
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Engineering and Material Science Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Possibility of Adding a Repeatability Requirement for the Indirect Verification of Charpy Machines in ASTM E23

Enrico Lucon
1 citations
Materials Performance and Characterization
Engineering and Material Science Research
2.93
article

On the Possibility of Adding a Repeatability Requirement for the Indirect Verification of Charpy Machines in ASTM E23

Enrico Lucon
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Since 1989, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Charpy Machine Verification Program in Boulder, Colorado, has been indirectly verifying Charpy machines around the world according to ASTM E23, <i>Standard Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic Materials</i>, and ISO 148-2, <i>Metallic Materials</i>-<i>Charpy Pendulum Impact Test</i>-<i>Part 2: Verification of Testing Machines</i>. Most of the indirect verifications results have been logged in a database, which at the end of May 2024 included 77,105 records, each one corresponding to 4-5 absorbed energy values at one of three energy levels (low, high, and super-high). Based on the analysis of this database, the acceptability criteria of ASTM E23, exclusively based on bias, have been compared with those of ISO 148-2, which also include repeatability. The objective of this study is to support the proposal of revising ASTM E23 by introducing repeatability requirements in addition to the existing bias criteria. Four proposals have been considered and assessed, leading to the selection of a set of repeatability limits (larger of 4 J and 15 % of certified absorbed energy) that only moderately increases the severity of the standard but, most importantly, prevents deeming machines acceptable that satisfy ASTM E23 bias but fail ISO 148-2 repeatability (approximately one sixth of all the machines verified by the NIST since 1990).

Materials Performance and CharacterizationVol. 14(1)
National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Engineering and Material Science Research
2.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.