The single-layer equivalent soil mass method for the evaluation of soil organic carbon stocks: Sources of errors, simplification, and associated detectable change

• Soil organic carbon stock must be monitored in equivalent soil mass layers. • Monitoring at fixed depth and fixed bulk density leads to unacceptable errors. • Soil layer mass was properly estimated with gouge-auger sampling. • Single-layer ESM method minimum detectable change was 3.5 Mg ha -1 . • The method was simplified while keeping errors acceptable, which decreases the cost. It has been well established that for consistent soil organic carbon stock ( SOCS ) monitoring over time, the SOCS must be determined in an equivalent soil mass (ESM) layer rather than a depth layer. This work focused on the single-layer ESM method, its cost, accuracy and simplification. With the objective of simplifying ESM method and reducing costs, we sampled 393 fields in western Switzerland and experimentally questioned the sampling methods, the sources of variance and the minimum detectable change ( MDC ) of SOCS , and possible simplification. The layer mass was accurately determined using gouge-augers, thus overcoming a major drawback in performing ESM SOCS evaluation. The relationships between number of aliquots and estimated SOCS variance was determined. Sampling at fixed depth and layer bulk density resulted in unacceptable errors and MDCs exceeding several decades when converted to years before a change was detectable. We introduced a new procedure to fully consider the coarse fraction volume in the layer, which remains a major source of error on the SOCS when the coarse fraction volume exceeds 10 % of the layer volume, while not impacting the detectability of the change. The single-layer ESM method provided an MDC corresponding to less than 10 years before SOCS change detectability under the average regional conditions, and mass correction results in negligible increase in MDC compared to that of the 0–30 cm layer. Simplifying this method by using the average soil organic carbon content of the layer mass correction only slightly increased the MDC , thus providing an opportunity to decrease the cost of SOCS monitoring significantly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoderma
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117279
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The single-layer equivalent soil mass method for the evaluation of soil organic carbon stocks: Sources of errors, simplification, and associated detectable change

Joanna M. Clark, Cédric Deluz, Téo Lemaître, Pascal Boivin et al.
Geoderma
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
article

The single-layer equivalent soil mass method for the evaluation of soil organic carbon stocks: Sources of errors, simplification, and associated detectable change

Joanna M. Clark, Cédric Deluz, Téo Lemaître, Pascal Boivin, Marie Guittonneau
article en

Abstract

• Soil organic carbon stock must be monitored in equivalent soil mass layers. • Monitoring at fixed depth and fixed bulk density leads to unacceptable errors. • Soil layer mass was properly estimated with gouge-auger sampling. • Single-layer ESM method minimum detectable change was 3.5 Mg ha -1 . • The method was simplified while keeping errors acceptable, which decreases the cost. It has been well established that for consistent soil organic carbon stock ( SOCS ) monitoring over time, the SOCS must be determined in an equivalent soil mass (ESM) layer rather than a depth layer. This work focused on the single-layer ESM method, its cost, accuracy and simplification. With the objective of simplifying ESM method and reducing costs, we sampled 393 fields in western Switzerland and experimentally questioned the sampling methods, the sources of variance and the minimum detectable change ( MDC ) of SOCS , and possible simplification. The layer mass was accurately determined using gouge-augers, thus overcoming a major drawback in performing ESM SOCS evaluation. The relationships between number of aliquots and estimated SOCS variance was determined. Sampling at fixed depth and layer bulk density resulted in unacceptable errors and MDCs exceeding several decades when converted to years before a change was detectable. We introduced a new procedure to fully consider the coarse fraction volume in the layer, which remains a major source of error on the SOCS when the coarse fraction volume exceeds 10 % of the layer volume, while not impacting the detectability of the change. The single-layer ESM method provided an MDC corresponding to less than 10 years before SOCS change detectability under the average regional conditions, and mass correction results in negligible increase in MDC compared to that of the 0–30 cm layer. Simplifying this method by using the average soil organic carbon content of the layer mass correction only slightly increased the MDC , thus providing an opportunity to decrease the cost of SOCS monitoring significantly.

GeodermaVol. 456
HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.