Assessing Chronotype: A Complex and Multifaceted Approach

Chronotype, a notion based on circadian rhythms, conceptualizes individual variability in sleep-wake cycles and preferred activities throughout a 24-hour period. Historically, self-reported sleep patterns have been used to determine chronotype, frequently ignoring important physiological and contextual elements including social habits, hormone cycles, and environmental influences. This article discusses the restrictions in the current chronotype models and in measuring instruments that rely on unidimensional frameworks. It puts forward a need for a holistic approach by integrating biological, social, and environmental components to enhance our understanding of chronotype. A suggested multidimensional model draws out the interaction between internal circadian systems and external influences and offers a better perspective. This integrated paradigm has the potential to improve chronobiological research and be used in clinical settings to treat chronotype-related illnesses. Future research directions aim to refine assessment tools and expand cross-cultural studies to fully capture the complexities of chronotype.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Chronobiology in Medicine
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33069/cim.2025.0003
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Chronotype: A Complex and Multifaceted Approach

Yogita Kalra, Prabhjyot Kour
2 citations
Chronobiology in Medicine
Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
3.01
article

Assessing Chronotype: A Complex and Multifaceted Approach

Yogita Kalra, Prabhjyot Kour
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Chronotype, a notion based on circadian rhythms, conceptualizes individual variability in sleep-wake cycles and preferred activities throughout a 24-hour period. Historically, self-reported sleep patterns have been used to determine chronotype, frequently ignoring important physiological and contextual elements including social habits, hormone cycles, and environmental influences. This article discusses the restrictions in the current chronotype models and in measuring instruments that rely on unidimensional frameworks. It puts forward a need for a holistic approach by integrating biological, social, and environmental components to enhance our understanding of chronotype. A suggested multidimensional model draws out the interaction between internal circadian systems and external influences and offers a better perspective. This integrated paradigm has the potential to improve chronobiological research and be used in clinical settings to treat chronotype-related illnesses. Future research directions aim to refine assessment tools and expand cross-cultural studies to fully capture the complexities of chronotype.

Chronobiology in MedicineVol. 7(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
3.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing Chronotype: A Complex and Multifaceted Approach — Yogita Kalra, Prabhjyot Kour · Chronobiology in Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS