Do women feel colder by nature? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of sex differences in physiological and subjective thermal responses

• Women feel significantly colder than men in cold environments. • Women have significantly lower mean skin temperature than men in cold environments. • Women have significantly higher body core temperature than men. • Menstruation, pregnancy, and menopause affect women's thermal assessment. How individuals perceive and evaluate their thermal environment is a key driver of thermoregulatory behaviour, which not only helps maintain personal comfort but also directly impacts building energy consumption - a sector responsible for approximately 30 % of global carbon dioxide emissions. Historically, human thermal assessment investigations have focused on men, resulting in thermal comfort models and regulations primarily based on male thermal responses. Yet, women often report feeling colder and more uncomfortable indoors, which diminishes their quality of life and promotes behaviours that lead to less energy-efficient building operations. Here, we conduct the first systematic literature review and meta-analysis to better understand sex differences in physiological and subjective thermal responses. Our findings indicate that women experience significantly colder sensations and lower skin temperatures than men in cold environments, but also that female thermal responses fluctuate over time due to menstruation, pregnancy, and menopause. However, the available data on these effects remains limited. Further research into individual differences is crucial to promote comfortable, energy-efficient and equitable spaces that can accommodate diverse thermal needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Building and Environment
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112936
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do women feel colder by nature? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of sex differences in physiological and subjective thermal responses

Hannah Pallubinsky, Dolaana M. Khovalyg, Giorgia Chinazzo, Marika Vellei et al.
5 citations
Building and Environment
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
5.82
article

Do women feel colder by nature? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of sex differences in physiological and subjective thermal responses

Hannah Pallubinsky, Dolaana M. Khovalyg, Giorgia Chinazzo, Marika Vellei, Sarah Carter
article en
5 citations

Abstract

• Women feel significantly colder than men in cold environments. • Women have significantly lower mean skin temperature than men in cold environments. • Women have significantly higher body core temperature than men. • Menstruation, pregnancy, and menopause affect women's thermal assessment. How individuals perceive and evaluate their thermal environment is a key driver of thermoregulatory behaviour, which not only helps maintain personal comfort but also directly impacts building energy consumption - a sector responsible for approximately 30 % of global carbon dioxide emissions. Historically, human thermal assessment investigations have focused on men, resulting in thermal comfort models and regulations primarily based on male thermal responses. Yet, women often report feeling colder and more uncomfortable indoors, which diminishes their quality of life and promotes behaviours that lead to less energy-efficient building operations. Here, we conduct the first systematic literature review and meta-analysis to better understand sex differences in physiological and subjective thermal responses. Our findings indicate that women experience significantly colder sensations and lower skin temperatures than men in cold environments, but also that female thermal responses fluctuate over time due to menstruation, pregnancy, and menopause. However, the available data on these effects remains limited. Further research into individual differences is crucial to promote comfortable, energy-efficient and equitable spaces that can accommodate diverse thermal needs.

Building and EnvironmentVol. 277
Northwestern University (US), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Arts et Métiers (FR), Charles Darwin University (AU), Maastricht University (NL), Institut de Mécanique et d'Ingénierie de Bordeaux (FR), Universitätsklinikum Aachen (DE), HESAM Université (FR), Institut Polytechnique de Bordeaux (FR), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
5.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.