Effects of moral stereotypes on the formation and persistence of group preferences

Do stereotypes have a stronger and more persistent effect on impressions when they are moral in tone? In two experiments ( N = 187), participants interacted with members of two groups in an interactive social decision game, modeled on a reward reinforcement task, in which they formed impressions of players based on their feedback. Prior to the task, participants were exposed to positive or negative group stereotypes that were moral or nonmoral in content. Although players from each group were, on average, equally likely to provide reward feedback, participants formed behavioral choice preferences for players from positively-stereotyped groups over negatively-stereotyped groups. Importantly, this effect was moderated by the moral content of the stereotypes: in the moral stereotype condition, participants formed more extreme initial expectancies for players' feedback and showed more resistance to updating in response to stereotype-disconfirming feedback, whereas in the nonmoral stereotype condition, initial expectancies were weaker and preferences were updated over time to match players' actual feedback. Study 2 replicated this effect and additionally showed that moral stereotypes generalize more strongly to impressions of novel group members compared with nonmoral stereotypes. Computational modeling suggests this moral stereotype effect is due to extreme initial expectancies combined with group-based updating of member impressions. Together, these studies demonstrate that moral stereotypes have a stronger influence on person impressions than nonmoral stereotypes, and that they do so by inducing stronger expectancies for a group member's behavior while impairing individuated updating. • Moral stereotypes had powerful and persistent effects on group member impressions. • Moral stereotypes impeded the updating of group member impressions. • A social reinforcement learning task assessed updating across repeated interactions. • Computational modeling identified moral effects on both expectancy and updating. • Addresses why moralized ethnic stereotypes are so insidious and persistent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104750
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of moral stereotypes on the formation and persistence of group preferences

Inga K. Rösler, David M. Amodio, Isabel Kerber
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Effects of moral stereotypes on the formation and persistence of group preferences

Inga K. Rösler, David M. Amodio, Isabel Kerber
article en

Abstract

Do stereotypes have a stronger and more persistent effect on impressions when they are moral in tone? In two experiments ( N = 187), participants interacted with members of two groups in an interactive social decision game, modeled on a reward reinforcement task, in which they formed impressions of players based on their feedback. Prior to the task, participants were exposed to positive or negative group stereotypes that were moral or nonmoral in content. Although players from each group were, on average, equally likely to provide reward feedback, participants formed behavioral choice preferences for players from positively-stereotyped groups over negatively-stereotyped groups. Importantly, this effect was moderated by the moral content of the stereotypes: in the moral stereotype condition, participants formed more extreme initial expectancies for players' feedback and showed more resistance to updating in response to stereotype-disconfirming feedback, whereas in the nonmoral stereotype condition, initial expectancies were weaker and preferences were updated over time to match players' actual feedback. Study 2 replicated this effect and additionally showed that moral stereotypes generalize more strongly to impressions of novel group members compared with nonmoral stereotypes. Computational modeling suggests this moral stereotype effect is due to extreme initial expectancies combined with group-based updating of member impressions. Together, these studies demonstrate that moral stereotypes have a stronger influence on person impressions than nonmoral stereotypes, and that they do so by inducing stronger expectancies for a group member's behavior while impairing individuated updating. • Moral stereotypes had powerful and persistent effects on group member impressions. • Moral stereotypes impeded the updating of group member impressions. • A social reinforcement learning task assessed updating across repeated interactions. • Computational modeling identified moral effects on both expectancy and updating. • Addresses why moralized ethnic stereotypes are so insidious and persistent.

Journal of Experimental Social PsychologyVol. 119
Cal Poly Humboldt (US), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Amsterdam University of the Arts (NL), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.