Assessment of AI ethical reflection: the development and validation of the AI ethical reflection scale (AIERS) for university students

Abstract This study developed and validated the AI Ethical Reflection Scale (AIERS), a tool for measuring university students’ ethical reflection on AI in three dimensions: AI ethical awareness, AI critical evaluation, and AI for social good. This study used a sample of 730 university students, and confirmatory factor analysis supported the three-dimensional structure of the AIERS, which demonstrated good internal consistency and construct validity. Additionally, we found evidence of convergent and discriminant validity, as AI ethical reflection was positively yet modestly correlated with AI literacy, indicating that AI ethical reflection is a related yet distinct construct from AI literacy. The study also explored the differences in AI ethical reflection based on gender, academic discipline, and prior AI experience. The results revealed that female students exhibited higher AI ethical awareness than male students. Furthermore, frequent AI users reported significantly greater AI ethical reflection across all dimensions than those who used AI less frequently or had never used it. However, no significant differences were found between Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics (STEM) and non-STEM students. Collectively, these findings emphasize the importance of integrating ethical considerations and hands-on AI experiences from diverse perspectives of gender in AI education across disciplines to promote the ethical and responsible use of AI among university students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00519-z
Citations
27
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
63.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of AI ethical reflection: the development and validation of the AI ethical reflection scale (AIERS) for university students

Ching Sing Chai, Ziying Wang, Jiajing Li, Vivian Lee
27 citations
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
63.87
article

Assessment of AI ethical reflection: the development and validation of the AI ethical reflection scale (AIERS) for university students

Ching Sing Chai, Ziying Wang, Jiajing Li, Vivian Lee
article en
27 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study developed and validated the AI Ethical Reflection Scale (AIERS), a tool for measuring university students’ ethical reflection on AI in three dimensions: AI ethical awareness, AI critical evaluation, and AI for social good. This study used a sample of 730 university students, and confirmatory factor analysis supported the three-dimensional structure of the AIERS, which demonstrated good internal consistency and construct validity. Additionally, we found evidence of convergent and discriminant validity, as AI ethical reflection was positively yet modestly correlated with AI literacy, indicating that AI ethical reflection is a related yet distinct construct from AI literacy. The study also explored the differences in AI ethical reflection based on gender, academic discipline, and prior AI experience. The results revealed that female students exhibited higher AI ethical awareness than male students. Furthermore, frequent AI users reported significantly greater AI ethical reflection across all dimensions than those who used AI less frequently or had never used it. However, no significant differences were found between Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics (STEM) and non-STEM students. Collectively, these findings emphasize the importance of integrating ethical considerations and hands-on AI experiences from diverse perspectives of gender in AI education across disciplines to promote the ethical and responsible use of AI among university students.

International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher EducationVol. 22(1)
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Auburn University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
63.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessment of AI ethical reflection: the development and validation of the AI ethical reflection scale (AIERS) for university students — Ching Sing Chai, Ziying Wang, et al. · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS