Design in entrepreneurship: Unveiling multiple interpretations and philosophical underpinnings

Abstract Design has become a prominent concept in entrepreneurship research and practise. However, previous literature has offered multiple, often divergent interpretations of the role of design in entrepreneurship. For example, studies have highlighted the benefits of adopting design thinking practises in entrepreneurial endeavours, using design science as a research method for studying entrepreneurship and treating entrepreneurial opportunities as design artefacts that entrepreneurs can shape. Although this multitude of perspectives reflects the conceptual richness of design, it simultaneously complicates the accumulation of scholarly understanding. To address this issue, we have conducted a systematic literature review, uncovering the philosophical assumptions underpinning different interpretations of design in entrepreneurship: (i) design as ontology ( entrepreneurship as design ), (ii) design as epistemology ( entrepreneurship research as design research ), (iii) design as phenomenology ( entrepreneurship as a means to design ), (iv) design as logic ( entrepreneurship by design ) and (v) design as methodology ( entrepreneurship through design ). Further, we have identified five modes of enquiry that can guide future studies of design in entrepreneurship. The resulting interpretive framework contributes to entrepreneurship theory and practise by providing a foundation for more conscious and systematic research on design in entrepreneurship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Management Reviews
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12397
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Design in entrepreneurship: Unveiling multiple interpretations and philosophical underpinnings

Stefano Magistretti, Nico Florian Klenner, Jeanne Liedtka, Silvia Sanasi
5 citations
International Journal of Management Reviews
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
13.80
article

Design in entrepreneurship: Unveiling multiple interpretations and philosophical underpinnings

Stefano Magistretti, Nico Florian Klenner, Jeanne Liedtka, Silvia Sanasi
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Design has become a prominent concept in entrepreneurship research and practise. However, previous literature has offered multiple, often divergent interpretations of the role of design in entrepreneurship. For example, studies have highlighted the benefits of adopting design thinking practises in entrepreneurial endeavours, using design science as a research method for studying entrepreneurship and treating entrepreneurial opportunities as design artefacts that entrepreneurs can shape. Although this multitude of perspectives reflects the conceptual richness of design, it simultaneously complicates the accumulation of scholarly understanding. To address this issue, we have conducted a systematic literature review, uncovering the philosophical assumptions underpinning different interpretations of design in entrepreneurship: (i) design as ontology ( entrepreneurship as design ), (ii) design as epistemology ( entrepreneurship research as design research ), (iii) design as phenomenology ( entrepreneurship as a means to design ), (iv) design as logic ( entrepreneurship by design ) and (v) design as methodology ( entrepreneurship through design ). Further, we have identified five modes of enquiry that can guide future studies of design in entrepreneurship. The resulting interpretive framework contributes to entrepreneurship theory and practise by providing a foundation for more conscious and systematic research on design in entrepreneurship.

International Journal of Management ReviewsVol. 27(4)
Australian National University (AU), Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (IT), University of Virginia (US), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
13.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.