Internal Audit Structure and Risk Management: Evidence From Public US Universities

ABSTRACT In the context of the 2019 US college admissions scandal, I investigate whether internal audit functions (IAFs) in public US universities design risk‐based audit plans. Specifically, I test the association between internal audit structure (i.e., centralized, decentralized and hybrid) and internal auditors' reactions to emerging admissions risk. The statistical results suggest that the IAFs of public US universities responded to admissions risk after the scandal. However, the responses vary among IAFs with different structures. Centralized IAFs emerged as early reactors to admissions risk, whereas decentralized IAFs promptly reacted to admissions risk post‐scandal. Hybrid IAFs demonstrated a tendency to address admissions risk both pre‐ and post‐scandal. This study leverages hand‐collected internal audit plans and reports to examine risk‐based audit plans in higher education. The findings provide empirical evidence that IAFs in higher education engage in risk‐based audit planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Auditing
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12376
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Internal Audit Structure and Risk Management: Evidence From Public US Universities

Han Yan
1 citations
International Journal of Auditing
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
3.91
article

Internal Audit Structure and Risk Management: Evidence From Public US Universities

Han Yan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the context of the 2019 US college admissions scandal, I investigate whether internal audit functions (IAFs) in public US universities design risk‐based audit plans. Specifically, I test the association between internal audit structure (i.e., centralized, decentralized and hybrid) and internal auditors' reactions to emerging admissions risk. The statistical results suggest that the IAFs of public US universities responded to admissions risk after the scandal. However, the responses vary among IAFs with different structures. Centralized IAFs emerged as early reactors to admissions risk, whereas decentralized IAFs promptly reacted to admissions risk post‐scandal. Hybrid IAFs demonstrated a tendency to address admissions risk both pre‐ and post‐scandal. This study leverages hand‐collected internal audit plans and reports to examine risk‐based audit plans in higher education. The findings provide empirical evidence that IAFs in higher education engage in risk‐based audit planning.

International Journal of AuditingVol. 29(3)
Fairfield University (US)
Washington State University
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.